검색
검색 팝업 닫기

Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords

Article

Split Viewer

Research Paper

Curr. Opt. Photon. 2024; 8(3): 239-245

Published online June 25, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.3.239

Copyright © Optical Society of Korea.

Single Logarithmic Amplification and Deep Learning-based Fixed-threshold On-off Keying Detection for Free-space Optical Communication

Qian-Wen Jing, Yan-Qing Hong

School of Information Science and Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China

Corresponding author: *hongy7@sut.edu.cn, ORCID 0000-0002-8460-085X

Received: January 25, 2024; Revised: April 4, 2024; Accepted: April 5, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This paper proposes single logarithmic amplification (single-LA) and deep learning (DL)-based fixed-threshold on-off keying (OOK) detection for free-space optical (FSO) communication. Multilevel LAs (MLAs) can be used to mitigate intensity fluctuations in the received OOK signal by their nonlinear gain characteristics; however, it is ineffective in the case of high scintillation, owing to degradation of the OOK signal’s extinction ratio. Therefore, a DL technique is applied to realize effective scintillation compensation in single-LA applications. Fully connected (FC) networks and fully connected neural networks (FCNN), which have nonlinear modeling characteristics, are deployed in this work. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated through simulations under various scintillation effects. Simulation results show that the proposed method outperforms the conventional adaptive-threshold-decision, single-LA-based, MLA-based, FC-based, and FCNN-based OOK detection techniques.

Keywords: Deep learning, Free-space optical communication, Single logarithmic amplification

OCIS codes: (010.1330) Atmospheric turbulence; (060.2605) Free-space optical communication; (060.4510) Optical communications

Free-space optical (FSO) communication is widely used in terrestrial, satellite, and deep-space links because of its wide bandwidth, lack of license requirement, high spectral efficiency, high data rate, ease of deployment, and low power consumption [1]. However, the atmospheric-turbulence-induced scintillation effect poses a significant challenge to an on-off keying (OOK)-FSO communication system; That is, the received OOK signal’s intensity variation causes difficulty in decision-threshold estimation [2].

Hence, research on mitigating the scintillation effect is crucial for enhancing the reliability and performance of FSO communication systems. Various techniques such as adaptive optics, adaptive-threshold decision (ATD), channel coding, and aperture averaging, have been studied to mitigate the scintillation effect [1, 3]. Adaptive-optics systems with wavefront sensing can detect and correct wavefront distortions in real time [4]. However, the drawback lies in the wavefront-correction capability under strong turbulence. ATD can mitigate the scintillation effect by estimating the bit-by-bit decision threshold using instantaneous channel-state information (CSI) [5]. Nevertheless, a large number of computations are required to obtain the instantaneous CSI and calculate the decision thresholds. The aperture-averaging technique employs a large-aperture receiver to reduce the scintillation effect; however, the deployment of a large aperture is a significant challenge in practice [6]. A generalized likelihood-ratio test (GLRT) receiver was used to detect the OOK sequence using the Viterbi algorithm [7]. However, pilot symbols are required for the beginning of data transmission. Polarization-shift OOK modulation has been studied using a linear polarizer and logarithmic amplifier (LA) to achieve a fixed-threshold decision (FTD) [8]. Nevertheless, polarization shifting and polarization-coordinate alignment are difficult to implement in OOK signals.

Recently, deep learning (DL) has emerged as a promising technique for optical communication systems. In [9], a universal artificial neural network (ANN) was proposed to classify both analog and digital modulation types using nine key features. However, reliance on training data and susceptibility to local optima limit its performance and applicability. A convolutional neural network (CNN) has been used to solve the phase-compensation problem caused by atmospheric turbulence in free-space orbital-angular-momentum-encoded quantum key distribution [10], but the training of DL models requires a large amount of data and numerous iterations. In [11], a receiver architecture based on a fully connected deep neural network (FC-DNN) was introduced and validated in underwater optical wireless communication to fulfill the received-signal synchronization and recovery data. Deep neural networks (DNNs) may be used to detect the received signals under incomplete CSI [12], but different model weights are required for various turbulence channels. In our previous work, multilevel LAs (MLAs) were utilized to suppress scintillation using nonlinear gains; However, the level of the MLA needs to be dynamically controlled under various scintillation effects to avoid degradation of the extinction ratio (ER), and noise from the PD and background was ignored [13]. Therefore, it is preferable to have single-LA-based OOK detection with the assistance of the DL technique.

In this study we propose a fixed-threshold OOK detection technique based on a single LA and DL. First, a single LA is deployed to reduce the scintillation effect of the received OOK signal by leveraging nonlinear gain characteristics. Then the DL model is applied to further compensate for scintillation by the training and recovery processes. Two DL models, fully connected (FC) networks and fully connected neural networks (FCNNs), are introduced, owing to the nonlinear modeling characteristics. Finally, FTD is realized by combining the single LA and DL. The efficiency of the proposed OOK transmission scheme is validated through simulations using various turbulent channels. The simulation results show that the bit-error-rate (BER) performance of this technique outperforms FTD, ATD, single-LA, MLA, and DL-based OOK detection under various turbulence channels.

A block diagram of the proposed single LA and DL-based OOK detection is shown in Fig. 1. A 1550-nm laser diode (LD) is directly modulated by an OOK signal s(t). The modulated laser beam propagates through the FSO links and experiences a turbulence-induced scintillation effect [1]. This effect is evaluated using the scintillation index σI2. The received OOK signal r(t) is denoted as

Figure 1.Block diagram of the proposed technique.

rt=Itst+NPD(t),

where I(t) represents the intensity fluctuation and NPD(t) denotes the combination of background and PD noise [14]. r(t) is converted into a digital signal r[k] by analog to-digital conversion (ADC). A single LA is deployed to decrease the scintillation-caused signal-intensity variation by means of nonlinear gain features, i.e. larger gain assigned to lower input-signal power and lower gain assigned to higher input-signal power. Besides, the reduction of signal-intensity variation improves the capability for feature representation and reduces the computational complexity of DL models. The LA-amplified signal rSLA[k] is given by

rSLA[k]=logar[k]+b=loga(I[k]s[k]+NPD[k]+b)+NLA[k]

where a and b are constants and NLA[k] denotes LA noise. The nonlinearity of the LA can be altered by the a and b values, and determines the degree of reduction of intensity variation. Besides, NLA[k] reduces the ER of the amplified signal. Two types of DL models, FC network and FCNN, are used after the single LA to compensate for the residual scintillation effect, using their nonlinear modeling capabilities. The output signal of the LA is used to train the DL models. In addition, early stopping and dropout are employed to prevent the DL models from overfitting.

Figure 2 shows the proposed DL-based detector using an FC network. The FC layer extracts and learns the feature input signal and maps the learned features into the convolution layer. Taking rSLA[k] as the input, the output of this layer HFC can be expressed as [15]

Figure 2.Proposed deep learning (DL)-based detector using Fully connected (FC) network.

HFC=σ(WFCrSLA+nFC),

where WFC is the weight matrix, n is the bias vector, and σ denotes the rectified-linear-unit (ReLU) activation function. The ReLU replaces a negative input value with 0 and retains an original positive input value. Then a 1D convolutional layer is introduced to compensate for the signal variation by constructing a nonlinear model using the extracted features, which is given by [16]

rout1=WconvHFC+nconv,

where Wconv is the convolution kernel and * denotes the convolution operation. The features learned in the convolutional layer can help the neural network to model the turbulence phenomenon effectively and nonlinearly, and thus perform turbulence compensation. Finally, the mean value of output rout1 is used as a fixed threshold to achieve FTD.

Figure 3 illustrates the DL-based detector using an FCNN [17]. The detector consists of two hidden layers ∈ R5 and one output layer ∈ R1. A hidden layer is used to extract and learn the feature input signal ySLA[k]. The output layer is applied to compensate for the turbulence effect by constructing a nonlinear model using the extracted features. The process for each layer is represented by

Figure 3.Proposed deep learning (DL)-based detector using a fully connected neural networks (FCNN).

HFCNN1=σW1rSLA+n1HFCNN2=σW2HFCNN1+n2rout2=σW3HFCNN2+n3,

where HFCNNi represents the output of the hidden layer, and rout2 represents the output of the output layer. The mean value of the output rout2 is also used as a fixed threshold for the FTD. Consequently, the proposed single LA and DL-based OOK detection methods can effectively compensate the scintillation effect.

We conduct a simulation to verify the proposed OOK transmission method. The proposed method is compared with ATD, single-LA, MLA-based, FC-based, and FCNN-based OOK detection techniques. LA with a larger base number has a high degree of gain nonlinearity, and the stronger level of turbulence effect causes a larger degree of received-signal-intensity variation. Thus the ER of the signal is degraded by LA more seriously with increasing base number of LA. Therefore, the base number of logarithmic amplification is set to 2, for the sake of reducing the signal’s ER distortion from LA under a stronger degree of turbulence effect.

In this work the lognormal distribution is used to model the scintillation effect, which is the major issue of a turbulence channel [18]. The model is derived from the temporal spectrum of log-amplitude fluctuations, and is given by

WA(f)=0.528π2k20LCn2(h)2πfv(h)[(κv(h))2(2πf)2]12κ83             sin2(κ2γh2k)F(γκ)dκdh

where A is the log-amplitude, L is the link distance, h is the altitude, Cn2 is the refractive-index structure parameter, V is the wind speed, κ is the optical wave number, λ is the wavelength, k is the spatial wave number, and F is the aperture filter function [19]. Then the phase modulation, inverse Fourier transform, and first-order Rytov approximation are applied to realize channel modeling [20]. Figure 4 shows the modeled turbulence channel at σI2 = 0.0596. The modeled channel has the features of time-varying intensity and low-frequency dominance, and its PDF follows the log-normal distribution. Therefore, this modeled channel is included in the simulation to emulate the scintillation effect. Figure 5 illustrates the BER performance of single-LA-based fixed OOK detection for various turbulent channels. The value of b is optimized for various σI2 values of 0.0596, 0.1256, 0.2080, and 0.4286. The b values of LA are optimized to 1.2 and 1.5 under these turbulence channels, and larger b values are required for stronger σI2 due to the higher degree of the received signal’s fluctuation. The BER increases with increasing b value of the single LA. However, the BER is reduced owing to the signal distortion from the serious nonlinear gains induced by the ER reduction.

Figure 4.Modeled turbulence channel for σI2 = 0.0596: (a) Time domain, (b) frequency domain, and (c) probability density function (PDF).

Figure 5.Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of single-logarithmic amplification (LA)-based fixed on-off keying (OOK) detection, under different b values of LA: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286.

Figure 6 depicts the BER performance of the MLA-based OOK detection for the optimized b value. For σI2 = 0.0596, the BER of single-LA-based OOK detection is poorer than that of ATD, because of ineffective scintillation compensation and amplified noise, and it surpasses FTD because of the intensity variation caused by variation in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In addition, the BER of MLA-based OOK detection increases with the addition of LA levels, owing to serious ER degradation. With the increase in scintillation effects, that is σI2 increase, the performance of MLA-based OOK detection dramatically declines because of significant ER degradation induced by nonlinear gains. Therefore, the DL technique is introduced to realize scintillation mitigation under a single LA.

Figure 6.Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of multilevel logarithmic amplification (MLA)-based on-off keying (OOK) detection, under optimized b value: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286. LA-n = 1, single-LA; MLAs-n = 2, 2-level of MLAs; MLAs-n = 4, 4-level of MLAs; MLAs-n = 6, 6-level of MLAs.

Figure 7 depicts the BER performance of the proposed single LA and DL-based OOK detection for the optimized b value. DL models of FC networks and FCNN are applied to improve the single-LA-based scintillation mitigation. The performance of the proposed single LA and FC network-based OOK detection is similar to that of the proposed single LA and FCNN-based fixed-threshold OOK detection techniques. In addition, both proposed methods outperform ATD, FC networks, and FCNN-based OOK signal detection, because the capability of FC networks and FCNN are enhanced by the reduction of signal-intensity variation using nonlinear LA. However, it is difficult to dynamically change the b value. Therefore, the proposed technique is evaluated with fixed a and b values. Figure 8 depicts BER performance of the proposed single LA and DL-based OOK detection for a fixed b value of the single LA. The b value of the single LA is fixed at 1.2, according to Fig. 5. The proposed technique with a fixed b value is close to ATD in performance. Therefore, the turbulence effect is effectively compensated using the proposed technique, with and without the optimization process. Consequently the proposed technique is effective for various turbulence channels. In this work, the proposed technique is discussed for LA with ideal characteristics; The bandwidth limitation of LA will be studied in our further work.

Figure 7.Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of the proposed single logarithmic amplification (LA) and deep learning (DL)-based on-off keying (OOK) detection for optimized b value: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286.

Figure 8.Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of the proposed single logarithmic amplification (LA) and deep learning (DL)-based on-off keying (OOK) detection for fixed b value: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286.

In conclusion, we have proposed single LA and DL-based fixed-threshold OOK detection techniques for FSO communication systems. FC networks and FCNN models were applied to realize single-LA-based scintillation compensation. The proposed OOK detection method was compared to FTD, ATD, single-LA, MLA, and DL-based OOK detection methods in simulations, under various turbulence effects. Simulation results illustrated that the proposed single LA and DL-based OOK detection techniques were effective for various turbulence channels. Therefore, it provides a promising solution to compensate for turbulence issues in FSO communication systems. Research on DL-based simultaneous LA optimization and scintillation-effect compensation will be conducted in our further work.

Department of Education of Liaoning Province (Grant no. JYTMS20231214); the Department of Science and Technology of Liaoning Province (Grant no. 2023JH2/ 101300225).

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time, but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

  1. H. Kaushal and G. Kaddoum, “Optical communication in space: Challenges and mitigation techniques,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 19, 57-96 (2017).
    CrossRef
  2. N. Blaunstein, S. Arnon, N. Kopeika, and A. Zilberman, Applied Aspects of Optical Communication and LIDAR (CRC Press, USA, 2009).
    CrossRef
  3. A. S. Hamza, J. S. Deogun, and D. R. Alexander, “Classification framework for free space optical communication links and systems,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21, 1346-1382 (2019).
    CrossRef
  4. S. Constantine, L. E. Elgin, M. L. Stevens, J. A. Greco, K. Aquino, D. D. Alves, and B. S. Robinson, “Design of a high-speed space modem for the lunar laser communications demonstration,” Proc. SPIE 7923, 792308 (2011).
    CrossRef
  5. L. Li, T. Geng, Y. Wang, X. Li, J. Wu, Y. Li, S. Ma, S. Gao, and Z. Wu, “Free-space optical communication using coherent detection and double adaptive detection thresholds,” IEEE Photon. J. 11, 7900217 (2019).
    CrossRef
  6. C. Abou-Rjeily, “Performance analysis of FSO communications with diversity methods: Add more relays or more apertures,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 33, 1890-1902 (2015).
    CrossRef
  7. T. Song and P. Kam, “A robust GLRT receiver with implicit channel estimation and automatic threshold adjustment for the free space optical channel with IM/DD,” J. Light. Technol. 32, 369-383 (2014).
    CrossRef
  8. Y.-Q. Hong, W.-H. Shin, and S.-K. Han, “Performance of scintillation mitigation for linear polarization shift on-off keying transmission in free-space optical communications,” IEEE Access 8, 128954-128960 (2020).
    CrossRef
  9. T. Young, D. Hazarika, S. Poria, and E. Cambria, “Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing,” IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 13, 55-75 (2018).
    CrossRef
  10. X. Wang, T. Wu, C. Dong, H. Zhu, Z. Zhu, and S. Zhao, “Integrating deep learning to achieve phase compensation for free-space orbital-angular-momentum-encoded quantum key distribution under atmospheric turbulence,” Photonics Re. 9, B9-B17 (2021).
    CrossRef
  11. Z. Du, H. Deng, Y. Dai, Y. Hua, B. Jia, Z. Qian, J. Xiong, W. Lyu, Z. Zhang, D. Ma, and J. Xu, “Experimental demonstration of an OFDM-UWOC system using a direct decoding FC-DNN-based receiver,” Opt. Commun. 508, 127785 (2022).
    CrossRef
  12. M. A. Amirabadi, “A deep learning based solution for imperfect CSI problem in correlated FSO communication channel,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11002 (2019).
  13. P.-Z. Yu, Q.-W. Jing, and Y.-Q. Hong, “Multi-level logarithmic amplification-based fixed threshold circular polarized on-off keying detection for free-space optical communications,” Photonics 10, 667 (2023).
    CrossRef
  14. W.-S. Tsai, H.-H. Lu, Y. Huang, S. Tu, and Q. Huang, “A PDM-based bi-directional fibre-FSO integration with two RSOAs scheme,” Sci. Rep. 9, 8317 (2019).
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. R. T. Jones, T. A. Eriksson, M. P. Yankov, and D. Zibar, “Deep learning of geometric constellation shaping including fiber nonlinearities,” in Proc. 2018 European Conference on Optical Communication-ECOC (Rome, Italy, Sep. 23-27, 2018), pp. 1-3.
    CrossRef
  16. T. O'Shea and J. Hoydis, “An introduction to deep learning for the physical layer,” IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw. 3, 563-575 (2017).
    CrossRef
  17. J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell, “Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation,” in Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Boston, Massachusetts, USA, Jun. 8-10, 2015), pp. 3431-3440.
    CrossRef
  18. S. Ding, J. Zhang, and A. Dang, “Adaptive threshold decision for on-off keying transmission systems in atmospheric turbulence,” Opt. Express 25, 24425-24436 (2017).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. H. Shen, L. Yu, and C. Fan, “Temporal spectrum of atmospheric scintillation and the effects of aperture averaging and time averaging,” Opt. Commun. 330, 160-164 (2014).
    CrossRef
  20. Y.-Q. Hong, G. Li, and Z.Y. Liu, “Optical adaptive power transmission using APC-EDFA for turbulence-tolerant FSO communications,” Opt. Express 29, 23777-23785 (2021).
    Pubmed CrossRef

Article

Research Paper

Curr. Opt. Photon. 2024; 8(3): 239-245

Published online June 25, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.3.239

Copyright © Optical Society of Korea.

Single Logarithmic Amplification and Deep Learning-based Fixed-threshold On-off Keying Detection for Free-space Optical Communication

Qian-Wen Jing, Yan-Qing Hong

School of Information Science and Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China

Correspondence to:*hongy7@sut.edu.cn, ORCID 0000-0002-8460-085X

Received: January 25, 2024; Revised: April 4, 2024; Accepted: April 5, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This paper proposes single logarithmic amplification (single-LA) and deep learning (DL)-based fixed-threshold on-off keying (OOK) detection for free-space optical (FSO) communication. Multilevel LAs (MLAs) can be used to mitigate intensity fluctuations in the received OOK signal by their nonlinear gain characteristics; however, it is ineffective in the case of high scintillation, owing to degradation of the OOK signal’s extinction ratio. Therefore, a DL technique is applied to realize effective scintillation compensation in single-LA applications. Fully connected (FC) networks and fully connected neural networks (FCNN), which have nonlinear modeling characteristics, are deployed in this work. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated through simulations under various scintillation effects. Simulation results show that the proposed method outperforms the conventional adaptive-threshold-decision, single-LA-based, MLA-based, FC-based, and FCNN-based OOK detection techniques.

Keywords: Deep learning, Free-space optical communication, Single logarithmic amplification

I. INTRODUCTION

Free-space optical (FSO) communication is widely used in terrestrial, satellite, and deep-space links because of its wide bandwidth, lack of license requirement, high spectral efficiency, high data rate, ease of deployment, and low power consumption [1]. However, the atmospheric-turbulence-induced scintillation effect poses a significant challenge to an on-off keying (OOK)-FSO communication system; That is, the received OOK signal’s intensity variation causes difficulty in decision-threshold estimation [2].

Hence, research on mitigating the scintillation effect is crucial for enhancing the reliability and performance of FSO communication systems. Various techniques such as adaptive optics, adaptive-threshold decision (ATD), channel coding, and aperture averaging, have been studied to mitigate the scintillation effect [1, 3]. Adaptive-optics systems with wavefront sensing can detect and correct wavefront distortions in real time [4]. However, the drawback lies in the wavefront-correction capability under strong turbulence. ATD can mitigate the scintillation effect by estimating the bit-by-bit decision threshold using instantaneous channel-state information (CSI) [5]. Nevertheless, a large number of computations are required to obtain the instantaneous CSI and calculate the decision thresholds. The aperture-averaging technique employs a large-aperture receiver to reduce the scintillation effect; however, the deployment of a large aperture is a significant challenge in practice [6]. A generalized likelihood-ratio test (GLRT) receiver was used to detect the OOK sequence using the Viterbi algorithm [7]. However, pilot symbols are required for the beginning of data transmission. Polarization-shift OOK modulation has been studied using a linear polarizer and logarithmic amplifier (LA) to achieve a fixed-threshold decision (FTD) [8]. Nevertheless, polarization shifting and polarization-coordinate alignment are difficult to implement in OOK signals.

Recently, deep learning (DL) has emerged as a promising technique for optical communication systems. In [9], a universal artificial neural network (ANN) was proposed to classify both analog and digital modulation types using nine key features. However, reliance on training data and susceptibility to local optima limit its performance and applicability. A convolutional neural network (CNN) has been used to solve the phase-compensation problem caused by atmospheric turbulence in free-space orbital-angular-momentum-encoded quantum key distribution [10], but the training of DL models requires a large amount of data and numerous iterations. In [11], a receiver architecture based on a fully connected deep neural network (FC-DNN) was introduced and validated in underwater optical wireless communication to fulfill the received-signal synchronization and recovery data. Deep neural networks (DNNs) may be used to detect the received signals under incomplete CSI [12], but different model weights are required for various turbulence channels. In our previous work, multilevel LAs (MLAs) were utilized to suppress scintillation using nonlinear gains; However, the level of the MLA needs to be dynamically controlled under various scintillation effects to avoid degradation of the extinction ratio (ER), and noise from the PD and background was ignored [13]. Therefore, it is preferable to have single-LA-based OOK detection with the assistance of the DL technique.

In this study we propose a fixed-threshold OOK detection technique based on a single LA and DL. First, a single LA is deployed to reduce the scintillation effect of the received OOK signal by leveraging nonlinear gain characteristics. Then the DL model is applied to further compensate for scintillation by the training and recovery processes. Two DL models, fully connected (FC) networks and fully connected neural networks (FCNNs), are introduced, owing to the nonlinear modeling characteristics. Finally, FTD is realized by combining the single LA and DL. The efficiency of the proposed OOK transmission scheme is validated through simulations using various turbulent channels. The simulation results show that the bit-error-rate (BER) performance of this technique outperforms FTD, ATD, single-LA, MLA, and DL-based OOK detection under various turbulence channels.

II. OPERATION PRINCIPLE

A block diagram of the proposed single LA and DL-based OOK detection is shown in Fig. 1. A 1550-nm laser diode (LD) is directly modulated by an OOK signal s(t). The modulated laser beam propagates through the FSO links and experiences a turbulence-induced scintillation effect [1]. This effect is evaluated using the scintillation index σI2. The received OOK signal r(t) is denoted as

Figure 1. Block diagram of the proposed technique.

rt=Itst+NPD(t),

where I(t) represents the intensity fluctuation and NPD(t) denotes the combination of background and PD noise [14]. r(t) is converted into a digital signal r[k] by analog to-digital conversion (ADC). A single LA is deployed to decrease the scintillation-caused signal-intensity variation by means of nonlinear gain features, i.e. larger gain assigned to lower input-signal power and lower gain assigned to higher input-signal power. Besides, the reduction of signal-intensity variation improves the capability for feature representation and reduces the computational complexity of DL models. The LA-amplified signal rSLA[k] is given by

rSLA[k]=logar[k]+b=loga(I[k]s[k]+NPD[k]+b)+NLA[k]

where a and b are constants and NLA[k] denotes LA noise. The nonlinearity of the LA can be altered by the a and b values, and determines the degree of reduction of intensity variation. Besides, NLA[k] reduces the ER of the amplified signal. Two types of DL models, FC network and FCNN, are used after the single LA to compensate for the residual scintillation effect, using their nonlinear modeling capabilities. The output signal of the LA is used to train the DL models. In addition, early stopping and dropout are employed to prevent the DL models from overfitting.

Figure 2 shows the proposed DL-based detector using an FC network. The FC layer extracts and learns the feature input signal and maps the learned features into the convolution layer. Taking rSLA[k] as the input, the output of this layer HFC can be expressed as [15]

Figure 2. Proposed deep learning (DL)-based detector using Fully connected (FC) network.

HFC=σ(WFCrSLA+nFC),

where WFC is the weight matrix, n is the bias vector, and σ denotes the rectified-linear-unit (ReLU) activation function. The ReLU replaces a negative input value with 0 and retains an original positive input value. Then a 1D convolutional layer is introduced to compensate for the signal variation by constructing a nonlinear model using the extracted features, which is given by [16]

rout1=WconvHFC+nconv,

where Wconv is the convolution kernel and * denotes the convolution operation. The features learned in the convolutional layer can help the neural network to model the turbulence phenomenon effectively and nonlinearly, and thus perform turbulence compensation. Finally, the mean value of output rout1 is used as a fixed threshold to achieve FTD.

Figure 3 illustrates the DL-based detector using an FCNN [17]. The detector consists of two hidden layers ∈ R5 and one output layer ∈ R1. A hidden layer is used to extract and learn the feature input signal ySLA[k]. The output layer is applied to compensate for the turbulence effect by constructing a nonlinear model using the extracted features. The process for each layer is represented by

Figure 3. Proposed deep learning (DL)-based detector using a fully connected neural networks (FCNN).

HFCNN1=σW1rSLA+n1HFCNN2=σW2HFCNN1+n2rout2=σW3HFCNN2+n3,

where HFCNNi represents the output of the hidden layer, and rout2 represents the output of the output layer. The mean value of the output rout2 is also used as a fixed threshold for the FTD. Consequently, the proposed single LA and DL-based OOK detection methods can effectively compensate the scintillation effect.

III. SIMULATIONS AND RESULTS

We conduct a simulation to verify the proposed OOK transmission method. The proposed method is compared with ATD, single-LA, MLA-based, FC-based, and FCNN-based OOK detection techniques. LA with a larger base number has a high degree of gain nonlinearity, and the stronger level of turbulence effect causes a larger degree of received-signal-intensity variation. Thus the ER of the signal is degraded by LA more seriously with increasing base number of LA. Therefore, the base number of logarithmic amplification is set to 2, for the sake of reducing the signal’s ER distortion from LA under a stronger degree of turbulence effect.

In this work the lognormal distribution is used to model the scintillation effect, which is the major issue of a turbulence channel [18]. The model is derived from the temporal spectrum of log-amplitude fluctuations, and is given by

WA(f)=0.528π2k20LCn2(h)2πfv(h)[(κv(h))2(2πf)2]12κ83             sin2(κ2γh2k)F(γκ)dκdh

where A is the log-amplitude, L is the link distance, h is the altitude, Cn2 is the refractive-index structure parameter, V is the wind speed, κ is the optical wave number, λ is the wavelength, k is the spatial wave number, and F is the aperture filter function [19]. Then the phase modulation, inverse Fourier transform, and first-order Rytov approximation are applied to realize channel modeling [20]. Figure 4 shows the modeled turbulence channel at σI2 = 0.0596. The modeled channel has the features of time-varying intensity and low-frequency dominance, and its PDF follows the log-normal distribution. Therefore, this modeled channel is included in the simulation to emulate the scintillation effect. Figure 5 illustrates the BER performance of single-LA-based fixed OOK detection for various turbulent channels. The value of b is optimized for various σI2 values of 0.0596, 0.1256, 0.2080, and 0.4286. The b values of LA are optimized to 1.2 and 1.5 under these turbulence channels, and larger b values are required for stronger σI2 due to the higher degree of the received signal’s fluctuation. The BER increases with increasing b value of the single LA. However, the BER is reduced owing to the signal distortion from the serious nonlinear gains induced by the ER reduction.

Figure 4. Modeled turbulence channel for σI2 = 0.0596: (a) Time domain, (b) frequency domain, and (c) probability density function (PDF).

Figure 5. Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of single-logarithmic amplification (LA)-based fixed on-off keying (OOK) detection, under different b values of LA: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286.

Figure 6 depicts the BER performance of the MLA-based OOK detection for the optimized b value. For σI2 = 0.0596, the BER of single-LA-based OOK detection is poorer than that of ATD, because of ineffective scintillation compensation and amplified noise, and it surpasses FTD because of the intensity variation caused by variation in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In addition, the BER of MLA-based OOK detection increases with the addition of LA levels, owing to serious ER degradation. With the increase in scintillation effects, that is σI2 increase, the performance of MLA-based OOK detection dramatically declines because of significant ER degradation induced by nonlinear gains. Therefore, the DL technique is introduced to realize scintillation mitigation under a single LA.

Figure 6. Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of multilevel logarithmic amplification (MLA)-based on-off keying (OOK) detection, under optimized b value: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286. LA-n = 1, single-LA; MLAs-n = 2, 2-level of MLAs; MLAs-n = 4, 4-level of MLAs; MLAs-n = 6, 6-level of MLAs.

Figure 7 depicts the BER performance of the proposed single LA and DL-based OOK detection for the optimized b value. DL models of FC networks and FCNN are applied to improve the single-LA-based scintillation mitigation. The performance of the proposed single LA and FC network-based OOK detection is similar to that of the proposed single LA and FCNN-based fixed-threshold OOK detection techniques. In addition, both proposed methods outperform ATD, FC networks, and FCNN-based OOK signal detection, because the capability of FC networks and FCNN are enhanced by the reduction of signal-intensity variation using nonlinear LA. However, it is difficult to dynamically change the b value. Therefore, the proposed technique is evaluated with fixed a and b values. Figure 8 depicts BER performance of the proposed single LA and DL-based OOK detection for a fixed b value of the single LA. The b value of the single LA is fixed at 1.2, according to Fig. 5. The proposed technique with a fixed b value is close to ATD in performance. Therefore, the turbulence effect is effectively compensated using the proposed technique, with and without the optimization process. Consequently the proposed technique is effective for various turbulence channels. In this work, the proposed technique is discussed for LA with ideal characteristics; The bandwidth limitation of LA will be studied in our further work.

Figure 7. Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of the proposed single logarithmic amplification (LA) and deep learning (DL)-based on-off keying (OOK) detection for optimized b value: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286.

Figure 8. Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of the proposed single logarithmic amplification (LA) and deep learning (DL)-based on-off keying (OOK) detection for fixed b value: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286.

IV. CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we have proposed single LA and DL-based fixed-threshold OOK detection techniques for FSO communication systems. FC networks and FCNN models were applied to realize single-LA-based scintillation compensation. The proposed OOK detection method was compared to FTD, ATD, single-LA, MLA, and DL-based OOK detection methods in simulations, under various turbulence effects. Simulation results illustrated that the proposed single LA and DL-based OOK detection techniques were effective for various turbulence channels. Therefore, it provides a promising solution to compensate for turbulence issues in FSO communication systems. Research on DL-based simultaneous LA optimization and scintillation-effect compensation will be conducted in our further work.

FUNDING

Department of Education of Liaoning Province (Grant no. JYTMS20231214); the Department of Science and Technology of Liaoning Province (Grant no. 2023JH2/ 101300225).

DISCLOSURES

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time, but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Block diagram of the proposed technique.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 239-245https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.3.239

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Proposed deep learning (DL)-based detector using Fully connected (FC) network.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 239-245https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.3.239

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Proposed deep learning (DL)-based detector using a fully connected neural networks (FCNN).
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 239-245https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.3.239

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Modeled turbulence channel for σI2 = 0.0596: (a) Time domain, (b) frequency domain, and (c) probability density function (PDF).
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 239-245https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.3.239

Fig 5.

Figure 5.Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of single-logarithmic amplification (LA)-based fixed on-off keying (OOK) detection, under different b values of LA: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 239-245https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.3.239

Fig 6.

Figure 6.Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of multilevel logarithmic amplification (MLA)-based on-off keying (OOK) detection, under optimized b value: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286. LA-n = 1, single-LA; MLAs-n = 2, 2-level of MLAs; MLAs-n = 4, 4-level of MLAs; MLAs-n = 6, 6-level of MLAs.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 239-245https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.3.239

Fig 7.

Figure 7.Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of the proposed single logarithmic amplification (LA) and deep learning (DL)-based on-off keying (OOK) detection for optimized b value: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 239-245https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.3.239

Fig 8.

Figure 8.Bit-error-rate (BER) performance of the proposed single logarithmic amplification (LA) and deep learning (DL)-based on-off keying (OOK) detection for fixed b value: (a) σI2 = 0.0596, (b) σI2 = 0.1256, (c) σI2 = 0.2080, and (d) σI2 = 0.4286.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 239-245https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.3.239

References

  1. H. Kaushal and G. Kaddoum, “Optical communication in space: Challenges and mitigation techniques,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 19, 57-96 (2017).
    CrossRef
  2. N. Blaunstein, S. Arnon, N. Kopeika, and A. Zilberman, Applied Aspects of Optical Communication and LIDAR (CRC Press, USA, 2009).
    CrossRef
  3. A. S. Hamza, J. S. Deogun, and D. R. Alexander, “Classification framework for free space optical communication links and systems,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21, 1346-1382 (2019).
    CrossRef
  4. S. Constantine, L. E. Elgin, M. L. Stevens, J. A. Greco, K. Aquino, D. D. Alves, and B. S. Robinson, “Design of a high-speed space modem for the lunar laser communications demonstration,” Proc. SPIE 7923, 792308 (2011).
    CrossRef
  5. L. Li, T. Geng, Y. Wang, X. Li, J. Wu, Y. Li, S. Ma, S. Gao, and Z. Wu, “Free-space optical communication using coherent detection and double adaptive detection thresholds,” IEEE Photon. J. 11, 7900217 (2019).
    CrossRef
  6. C. Abou-Rjeily, “Performance analysis of FSO communications with diversity methods: Add more relays or more apertures,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 33, 1890-1902 (2015).
    CrossRef
  7. T. Song and P. Kam, “A robust GLRT receiver with implicit channel estimation and automatic threshold adjustment for the free space optical channel with IM/DD,” J. Light. Technol. 32, 369-383 (2014).
    CrossRef
  8. Y.-Q. Hong, W.-H. Shin, and S.-K. Han, “Performance of scintillation mitigation for linear polarization shift on-off keying transmission in free-space optical communications,” IEEE Access 8, 128954-128960 (2020).
    CrossRef
  9. T. Young, D. Hazarika, S. Poria, and E. Cambria, “Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing,” IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 13, 55-75 (2018).
    CrossRef
  10. X. Wang, T. Wu, C. Dong, H. Zhu, Z. Zhu, and S. Zhao, “Integrating deep learning to achieve phase compensation for free-space orbital-angular-momentum-encoded quantum key distribution under atmospheric turbulence,” Photonics Re. 9, B9-B17 (2021).
    CrossRef
  11. Z. Du, H. Deng, Y. Dai, Y. Hua, B. Jia, Z. Qian, J. Xiong, W. Lyu, Z. Zhang, D. Ma, and J. Xu, “Experimental demonstration of an OFDM-UWOC system using a direct decoding FC-DNN-based receiver,” Opt. Commun. 508, 127785 (2022).
    CrossRef
  12. M. A. Amirabadi, “A deep learning based solution for imperfect CSI problem in correlated FSO communication channel,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11002 (2019).
  13. P.-Z. Yu, Q.-W. Jing, and Y.-Q. Hong, “Multi-level logarithmic amplification-based fixed threshold circular polarized on-off keying detection for free-space optical communications,” Photonics 10, 667 (2023).
    CrossRef
  14. W.-S. Tsai, H.-H. Lu, Y. Huang, S. Tu, and Q. Huang, “A PDM-based bi-directional fibre-FSO integration with two RSOAs scheme,” Sci. Rep. 9, 8317 (2019).
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. R. T. Jones, T. A. Eriksson, M. P. Yankov, and D. Zibar, “Deep learning of geometric constellation shaping including fiber nonlinearities,” in Proc. 2018 European Conference on Optical Communication-ECOC (Rome, Italy, Sep. 23-27, 2018), pp. 1-3.
    CrossRef
  16. T. O'Shea and J. Hoydis, “An introduction to deep learning for the physical layer,” IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw. 3, 563-575 (2017).
    CrossRef
  17. J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell, “Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation,” in Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Boston, Massachusetts, USA, Jun. 8-10, 2015), pp. 3431-3440.
    CrossRef
  18. S. Ding, J. Zhang, and A. Dang, “Adaptive threshold decision for on-off keying transmission systems in atmospheric turbulence,” Opt. Express 25, 24425-24436 (2017).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. H. Shen, L. Yu, and C. Fan, “Temporal spectrum of atmospheric scintillation and the effects of aperture averaging and time averaging,” Opt. Commun. 330, 160-164 (2014).
    CrossRef
  20. Y.-Q. Hong, G. Li, and Z.Y. Liu, “Optical adaptive power transmission using APC-EDFA for turbulence-tolerant FSO communications,” Opt. Express 29, 23777-23785 (2021).
    Pubmed CrossRef