검색
검색 팝업 닫기

Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords

Article

Split Viewer

Research Paper

Curr. Opt. Photon. 2024; 8(1): 30-37

Published online February 25, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Copyright © Optical Society of Korea.

SLODAR System Development for Vertical Atmospheric Disturbance Profiling at Geochang Observatory

Ji Yong Joo1, Hyeon Seung Ha1, Jun Ho Lee1,2 , Do Hwan Jung1,3, Young Soo Kim1,3, Timothy Butterley4

1Department of Optical Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonan 31080, Korea
2Institute of Application and Fusion for Light, Kongju National University, Cheonan 31080, Korea
3Electro-Optical Team, Hanwha Systems Co., Seongnam 13524, Korea
4Department of Physics, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: *jhlsat@kongju.ac.kr, ORCID 0000-0002-4075-3504

Received: November 22, 2023; Revised: December 11, 2023; Accepted: December 20, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Implemented at the Geochang Observatory in South Korea, our slope detection and ranging (SLODAR) system features a 508 mm Cassegrain telescope (f/7.8), incorporating two Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensors (WFS) for precise measurements of atmospheric phase distortions, particularly from nearby binary or double stars, utilizing an 8 × 8 grid of sampling points. With an ability to reconstruct eight-layer vertical atmospheric profiles, the system quantifies the refractive index structure function (Cn2) through the crossed-beam method. Adaptable in vertical profiling altitude, ranging from a few hundred meters to several kilometers, contingent on the separation angle of binary stars, the system operates in both wide (2.5 to 12.5 arcminute separation angle) and narrow modes (11 to 15 arcsecond separation angle), covering altitudes from 122.3 to 611.5 meters and 6.1 to 8.3 kilometers, respectively. Initial measurements at the Geochang Observatory indicated Cn2 values up to 181.7 meters with a Fried parameter (r0) of 8.4 centimeters in wide mode and up to 7.8 kilometers with an r0 of 8.0 centimeters in narrow mode, suggesting similar seeing conditions to the Bohyun Observatory and aligning with a comparable 2014–2015 seeing profiling campaign in South Korea.

Keywords: Adaptive optics, Atmospheric turbulence, Fried parameter, Refractive index structure function (Cn2), SLODAR

OCIS codes: (010.1330) Atmospheric turbulence; (120.4640) Optical instruments; (220.1080) Active or adaptive optics; (350.1260) Astronomical optics

Many observatories that operate adaptive optics (AO) use vertical atmospheric turbulence profiling for site evaluation, adaptive optics design and operation, and optimization [16]. In addition, real-time vertical turbulence profiling is also required for various AO algorithms, such as three-dimensional (3D) tomography wavefront reconstruction, optimal conjugate altitude search, and image post-processing tasks related to point spread function reconstruction. As a result, real-time vertical atmospheric turbulence profiling is very important for AO [79].

There are several instruments for measuring atmospheric turbulence profiles, each with its own advantages and limitations in terms of cost, vertical resolution, altitude range, and ease of implementation [918]. These include slope detection and ranging (SLODAR) [913], scintillation detection and ranging (SCIDAR) [1416], differential image motion monitor (DIMM) [17, 18], and multi-aperture scintillation sensor (MASS) [17]. Especially, the SLODAR method, proposed by Wilson [10] in 2002, is valued for its cost-effectiveness in manufacturing and its efficacy in measuring turbulence profiles, making it widely utilized in many astronomical observatories [913].

There are several astronomical observatories in Korea, including the Bohyun and Geochang Observatories [19, 20]. Notably, the Bohyun Observatory is home to Korea’s largest ground-based 1.8 m telescope, while the Geochang Observatory is dedicated to satellite laser ranging with a 1.0 m SLR telescope [20]. Regarding astronomical seeing evaluation, there are several reports on the Bohyun Observatory, including a seeing campaign carried out with a similar SLODAR system as reported herein for one year starting in June 2014 [21, 22]. However, there are no reports on atmospheric seeing evaluation at the Geochang Observatory, which is essential for further improvement in measurement accuracy, potentially aided by the use of adaptive optics [23, 24]. In response to this gap, we have taken the initiative to develop and install an atmospheric vertical seeing profiler utilizing a SLODAR for the Geochang Observatory.

In Section 2, we present a comprehensive overview of SLODAR technology and its development. Section 3 reports on the initial observation results, and Section 4 serves as the concluding section for this paper.

2.1. Principles

In 2002, Wilson proposed the SLODAR method, a technique reconstructing vertical optical turbulence profiles through cross-covariance measurements from two Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensors (WFS) measurements for a pair of nearby stars, known as the crossed-beam method [10]. Figure 1 illustrates the schematic concept of the crossed-beam method. Within this technique, the vertical resolution (δh) and the maximum measurement altitude (Hmax) are defined as below:

Figure 1.Schematic diagram illustrating the crossed-beam method. This specific diagram depicts the construction of 8 layers of vertical profiling with 8 sub-aperture wavefront sensing [13].

δh=ω/θ,
Hmax=N1×δh,

where θ represents the angular separation of the stars, and ω is the size of the sub-aperture in the wavefront sensing. N denotes the number of sub-apertures. Increasing the separation angle of the binary stars enhances vertical resolution but reduces the maximum altitude [913].

The SLODAR consists of a telecentric lens, a prism mirror, and two WFSs, and is attached to the rear end of the telescope. The prism mirror reflects the binary stars at a 45° onto the WFSs. Each WFS is composed of a collimating lens, a micro lens array (MLA), and an electron multiplying-charge coupled device (EM-CCD). Figure 2 shows the optical schematic of the SLODAR.

Figure 2.Optical schematic of the SLODAR [13].

In the crossed-beam method, the number of turbulence profiling layers is determined by the number of sub-apertures on the WFS laid in the telescope pupil, and the altitude is determined by the separation angle of the binary star. SLODAR operates in two modes based on this separation angle: The wide mode for measuring turbulence at lower altitudes and the narrow mode for higher altitudes [13]. In the narrow mode, where the separation angle is very narrow, binary stars cannot be separated using a prism mirror, so two focal points are placed per MLA pitch using a single WFS. For the wide mode, the binary stars can be sufficiently separated by the prism mirror, placing one focal point per MLA pitch, and utilizing two WFSs. Figures 3 and 4 show the optical layouts and WFS images for both modes.

Figure 3.Optical schematics of the two SLODAR operation modes: (a) wide and (b) narrow.

Figure 4.Wave-front sensors (WFS) images of the two SLODAR operation modes: (a) wide and (b) narrow.

In the crossed-beam method, the layer turbulence profile is reconstructed from the cross-covariance of the binary star phase slope, while the overall turbulence profile is reconstructed from the auto-covariance of the single star phase slope [13]. The formulas for cross-covariance and auto-covariance are as given by:

Cδi,δj= i,js i,jt si+δi,j+δjt/Oδi,δj,
Aδi,δj= i,js i,jtsi+δi,j+δjt/Oδi,δj.

Here, ensemble < > refers to the average over frames and si,j(t) denotes the slope of the sub-aperture (i, j) at time t. s′ represents the slope of the second star, and O(δi, δj) denotes the number of overlapped pixels for (δi, δj). Finally, the measured covariance can be compared with the reference covariance applied with the Kolmogorov model to estimate the atmospheric turbulence profile.

2.2. Initial Design

The SLODAR’s initial design is crucial to the overall performance and efficiency of the system. The initial design of SLODAR, which includes the selection of the collimating lens and MLA, can be conducted based on the specifications of the telescope and EM-CCD. We utilized a corrected Dall-Kirkham (CDK) type telescope with a diameter of 508 mm and an EM-CCD known for its extremely low spurious noise. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the specifications of the telescope and the EM-CCD, respectively [25, 26].

TABLE 1 Telescope specifications [25]

ParameterValue
ModelCDK 20
TypeCDK
Primary Mirror Diameter (mm)508
Secondary Mirror Diameter (mm)191
Focal Ratiof/7.77
Focal Length (mm)3,951
Back Focal Length (mm)269
Image Scale (arcsec/mm)52.2
Weight (kg)63.5


TABLE 2 EM-CCD specifications [26]

ParameterValue
ModelAndor iXon Life 897
Active Pixels512 × 512
Pixel Size (μm)16 × 16
Active Pixel Well Depth180,000 e-
Gain Register Pixel Well Depth800,000 e-
Max Readout Rate (MHz)17
Frame Rate (fps)56
Readout Noise (NR)<1 e-
Dark Current (ND)0.0003 e-/pix/sec


We require a collimated beam size of MLA pitch × 8 at the WFS to measure an 8-layer atmospheric profile. The collimating lens focal length can be determined by considering the collimated beam diameter, denoted as DC.B., and the telescope F-number, represented as F/#Tele..

fcoll.=F/#Tele. ×DC.B.

The MLA can be optimally selected by considering the sampling ratio in the WFS. To calculate the sampling ratio, which is the number of pixels per FWHM (Full Width at Half Maximum), both the diffraction limited FWHM and the WFS image scale are required. The diffraction limited FWHM can be calculated using the diameter of the sub-aperture, denoted as ω, and the wavelength [24]. D.L. represents the diffraction limit in arcsec units, and lambda corresponds to the V-band (550 nm) [13].

D.L.=206265×1.22×λ/ω.

The I.S.WFS represents the WFS image scale in arcsec/pixel, and the sampling ratio, denoted as S.R., can be calculated by dividing the D.L. by the I.S.WFS. P represents the pixel size.

I.S.WFS=I.S.Tele.×P×fcoll./fMLA,
S.R.=0.5×D.L./I.S.WFS.

A sampling ratio of approximately 1.5 is suitable for centroid calculation [27]. The collimating lens was selected with a focal length of 30 mm, and the MLA was chosen with a pitch of 500 µm and a focal length of 32.8 mm.

2.3. Optimization

Sufficient illumination is required in the WFS images for centroid computation. Considering the obstruction, it is necessary to use more than 40 focal points with sufficient illumination in the 8 × 8 MLA area. We determined the collimated beam diameter to be approximately 4.25 mm to ensure that the illumination was above 0.7 for more than 40 focal points. Illumination can be verified through the coordinates on the MLA plane represented by x, and the radius of the collimated beam represented by r.

Illumination=x1x2 x2r2 dx.

In the SLODAR design, telescope telecentricity is essential [13]. Using Eq (4), the Focal ratio including the telecentric lens can be determined. We designed the telecentric lens to achieve a Focal ratio of f /7.06. Figure 5 shows the optical schematic of the SLODAR without the prism mirror and the illumination of the 40 focal points observed on the MLA plane.

Figure 5.SLODAR design: (a) SLODAR optical schematic without the prism mirror, and (b) illumination on the micro lens array (MLA) plane.

Additionally, for accurate altitude turbulence measurements, conjugation is required between the MLA and the telescope pupil. Without conjugation, the turbulence strength measured at the ground (0 m) could have an error of several meters from the actual altitude. The conjugation design was carried out by placing the MLA at a stop pupil position.

The optimized SLODAR can determine the observable separation angle of binary stars. The dimensions of the prism mirror determine the range of separation angles for binary stars observable in wide mode. In narrow mode, the range of observable separation angles for binary stars is determined by the MLA pitch. The determined separation angles are 2.5–12.5 arcmin for wide mode and 11–15 arcsec for narrow mode. Figure 6 shows the final developed SLODAR, and Table 3 presents the SLODAR specifications.

Figure 6.Telescope and SLODAR image.

TABLE 3 SLODAR specifications

Target SeparationWide Mode2.5–12.5 arcmin
Narrow Mode11–15 arcsec
No. of Measurements Layer8
CCD Exposure Time (ms) (Frame Rate: 56 Hz)3
Minimum Elevation (°)45
Minimum Moon-target Separation (°)15


All instruments are controlled from the operator room, located a few meters away from the dome. The operator room is equipped with a workstation, telescope controller, stage controller, and network power controller. The workstation not only controls the instruments, but also stores data, and performs atmospheric turbulence calculations using algorithms. Figure 7 shows the SLODAR system.

Figure 7.SLODAR system overview: (a) Telescope, (b) SLODAR, (c) workstation, and (d) dome.

2.4. Observation

The operation of the SLODAR system proceeds in the following order: Checking ambient conditions, selecting, and pointing to the target, and data measurement.

The observer must ensure that two conditions are satisfied (humidity <70% and wind speed <13 m/s) before opening the dome. High humidity can cause dew to form on the optical system, and strong winds can cause the telescope to shake, making observation difficult [13].

After opening the dome, the operator should select and point to the target. The target is chosen from a list of binary stars, which has been compiled from the Tycho-2 star catalogue and the Washington double star catalogue, containing observable binary stars. The list of binary stars primarily used at the Geochang SLR Observatory is presented in Table 4, and the observation conditions are as follows:

TABLE 4 Primary targets list at Geochang SLR Observatory (35°35’24.0”N 127°55’12.0”E)

ModeBinary Star IDSeparation AngleHmax (δh) (m)
Wide Mode03-02a3.3’458.9 (65.6)
08-13a8.4’181.7 (25.9)
10-10a10.2’150.3 (21.5)
Narrow ModeSTF196211.7”7,836.3 (1,119.5)
STF33112.0”7,640.4 (1,091.5)
STF2280AB14.3”6,411.5 (915.9)


(1) Binary stars within the target separation range,

(2) Binary stars with an apparent magnitude of 7 or less,

(3) Binary stars located more than 15 degrees from the moon,

(4) Binary stars with an elevation angle of 45 degrees or higher.

After selecting and pointing to the target, we begin measuring the slope using binary stars. When using wide mode, we measure the slope from each of the two WFS. In narrow mode, we measure the slopes from a single WFS. For narrow mode, the MLA pitch is divided horizontally into two sections, and the slope is measured for each area. The exposure time during measurement is 3 ms, and we store the slope data in packets, with each packet containing 1,000 frames. If the target’s elevation angle drops below 45 degrees or if observation becomes difficult, we switch to a different target and resume measurement.

3.1. Site Description

The Geochang SLR Observatory is located on the top of Mt. Gamak, which is located near to the city of Geochang, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea. Its coordinates are 35°35’24.0”N 127°55’12.0”E, and it stands at an elevation of 952 meters. Figure 8 shows the location of the Geochang SLR Observatory.

Figure 8.Geochang SLR Observatory location on maps.

The observatory often receives heavy fog from late spring through early autumn due to its proximity to a fully filled water reservoir located 3.5 kilometers away. Especially from June to September, the average humidity exceeds 70%, and high precipitation imposes limitations on observations. As a result, the primary period for observations at the observatory is mainly from late autumn to mid-spring.

Figure 9 presents the monthly variation of the main meteorological conditions in Geochang. This graph is derived from 30 years of historical observation data by the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) from 1992 to 2022 [28]. These results are very similar to the meteorological conditions at the Bohyun Observatory.

Figure 9.Monthly variations of temperature, precipitation, and humidity of Geochang: (a) Recent 30-year average temperature and precipitation graph, (b) recent 30-year average humidity graph.

3.2. Initial Observation

We conducted initial observations at the Geochang SLR Observatory on June 16, 2023, utilizing wide and narrow measurement modes. The observations were conducted sequentially, with a 1-hour separation, over 30 minutes each. In the wide mode, observations were performed with a binary star of 8.4’ angular separation (ID 08-13a) from 21:30 to 22:00 local time. Subsequently, narrow mode observations were conducted from 23:00 to 23:30 local time with a binary star of 11.7” angular separation (STF 1962). Figure 10 displays the sampled auto-covariance and cross-covariance for the wide binary star (ID 08-13a) with two components referred to as left and right, as defined in Eqs. (3) and (4).

Figure 10.Sampled auto-covariance and cross-covariance of the wide binary star (ID 08-13a).

From each observation, ten mean turbulence profiles were derived over 3 minutes using the method described in Section 2.1. Throughout this period, the statistical properties of atmospheric disturbance can be considered as not varying.

Firstly, Fig. 11 illustrates the measured Fried parameter (r0) for both wide and narrow modes. The average values over 30 minutes are 8.8 cm for the wide mode and 8.4 cm for the narrow mode. This suggests that the overall seeing strength did not change significantly during the two hours of observation. The number of observations is too few to reach any conclusions. However, regarding the overall seeing strength in terms of the Fried parameter (r0), the mean value at the SLR site aligns well with the statistical distribution of the seeing conditions observed at the Bohyun Observatory, which has a mean value of 8.28 cm with a standard deviation of 2.25 cm [21].

Figure 11.Initial measurements of Fried parameter (ro) using wide and narrow measurement modes, sequentially over 30 minutes each. Each data point represents the mean value over 3 minutes.

Secondly, Fig. 12 displays ten Cn2 profiles along with their mean profile obtained from the wide mode. The wide mode allowed us to capture detailed Cn2 vertical profiles near the ground, a crucial aspect for wide-field AO or ground AO imaging. The specific measurement covered an altitude range of 181.1 meters with an increment of 25.9 meters. The results indicate that the most significant atmospheric disturbance occurs around the ground layer, with a few weaker layers observed around 50 meters in altitude.

Figure 12.Initial Cn2 profiles over 30 minutes from wide modes. (a) Ten mean Cn2 profiles, (b) overall mean Cn2 profiles.

Similarly, Fig. 13 displays ten Cn2 profiles along with their mean profile obtained from the narrow mode. The narrow mode enabled the capture of overall Cn2 vertical profiles up to 5–10 km, providing crucial information for estimating the scintillation effect caused by high wind speeds around high altitudes. The specific measurement covered an altitude range of 5.7 kilometers with an increment of 814 meters. The narrow mode measurement also confirmed that the most significant atmospheric disturbance occurs around the ground layer. However, it revealed a few weaker layers observed around 4 km and 6 km altitudes.

Figure 13.Initial Cn2 profiles over 30 minutes from narrow modes. (a) Ten mean Cn2 profiles, (b) overall mean Cn2 profiles.

We developed the SLODAR system at the Geochang SLR Observatory in South Korea to characterize turbulence profiles. The SLODAR system, featuring a 508 mm Cassegrain telescope, reconstructs an eight-layer vertical atmospheric profile. Initial observations were conducted at the Geochang SLR Observatory on June 16, 2023, operating in both wide and narrow modes for 30 minutes each. The average Fried parameter over 30 minutes is 8.8 cm for the wide mode and 8.4 cm for the narrow mode. Additionally, strong turbulence was found in the ground layer for both modes. These findings indicate similar observational conditions to those at the Bohyun Observatory, and we plan to continue real-time vertical atmospheric turbulence profiling at the Geochang SLR Observatory for over a year.

The research grant of the Kongju National University in 2022; the DRATRI grant funded by DAPA (Laser guide star adaptive optics, Grant no. UC200014D*).

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time, but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

  1. R. Wilson, “Results of the JOSE site evaluation project for adaptive optics at the William Herschel Telescope,” New Astron. Rev. 42, 465-469 (1998).
    CrossRef
  2. B. L. Ellerbroek and F. J. Rigaut, “Scaling multiconjugate adaptive optics performance estimates to extremely large telescopes,” Proc. SPIE 4007, 1088-1099 (2000).
    CrossRef
  3. A. Tokovinin, “Seeing Improvement with Ground-Layer Adaptive Optics,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 116, 941-951 (2004).
    CrossRef
  4. L. Wang, M. Schöck, and G. Chanan, “Atmospheric turbulence profiling with SLODAR using multiple adaptive optics wavefront sensors,” Appl. Opt. 47, 1880-1892 (2008).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. L. Y. Liu, Y. Q. Yao, J. Vernin, H. S. Wang, J. Yin, and X. Qian, “Multi-instrument characterization of optical turbulence at the Ali observatory,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 595, 012019 (2015).
    CrossRef
  6. Y. H. Ono, C. M. Correia, D. R. Andersen, O. Lardière, S. Oya, M. Akiyama, K. Jackson, and C. Bradley, “Statistics of turbulence parameters at Mauna Kea using the multiple wavefront sensor data of RAVEN,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 465, 4931-4941 (2017).
    CrossRef
  7. F. Vidal, E. Gendron, M. Brangier, A. Sevin, G. Rousset, and Z. Hubert, “Tomography reconstruction using the Learn and Apply algorithm,” in Proc. 1st AO4ELT conference (Paris, France, Jun. 22-26, 2009), p. article no. 07001.
    CrossRef
  8. L. Gilles and B. L. Ellerbroek, “Real-time turbulence profiling with a pair of laser guide star shack hartmann wavefront sensors for wide-field adaptive optics systems on large to extremely large telescopes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 76-83 (2010).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. A. Y. Shikhovtsev, P. G. Kovadlo, A. V. Kiselev, D. Y. Kolobov, V. P. Lukin, I. V. Russkikh, and M. Y. Shikhovtsev, “Modified method to detect the turbulent layers in the atmospheric boundary layer for the large solar vacuum telescope,” Atmosphere 12, 159 (2021).
    CrossRef
  10. R. W. Wilson, “SLODAR: measuring optical turbulence altitude with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 337, 103-108 (2002).
    CrossRef
  11. T. Butterley, R. W. Wilson, and M. Sarazin, “Determination of the profile of atmospheric optical turbulence strength from SLODAR data,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 369, 835-845 (2006).
    CrossRef
  12. M. Goodwin, C. Jenkins, and A. Lambert, “Improved detection of atmospheric turbulence with SLODAR,” Opt. Express 15, 14844-14860 (2007).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. T. Butterley, R. W. Wilson, M. Sarazin, C. M. Dubbeldam, J. Osborn, and P. Clark, “Characterization of the ground layer of turbulence at Paranal using a robotic SLODAR System,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492, 934-949 (2020).
    CrossRef
  14. J. Vernin and F. Roddier, “Experimental determination of two-dimensional spatiotemporal power spectra of stellar light scintillation evidence for a multilayer structure of the air turbulence in the upper troposphere,” Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 270-273 (1973).
    CrossRef
  15. R. Avila, J. L. Avilés, R. Wilson, M. Chun, T. Butterley, and E. Carrasco, “LOLAS: An optical turbulence profiler in the atmospheric boundary layer with extreme altitude-resolution,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 387, 1511-1516 (2008).
    CrossRef
  16. H. W. Shepherd, J. Osborn, R. W. Wilson, T. Butterley, R. Avila, V. S. Dhillon, and T. J. Morris, “Stereo-SCIDAR: Optical turbulence profiling with high sensitivity using a modified SCIDAR instrument,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, 3568-3577 (2014).
    CrossRef
  17. A. Tokovinin and V. Kornilov, “Accurate seeing measurements with MASS and DIMM,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 381, 1179-1189 (2007).
    CrossRef
  18. E. Aristidi, A. Ziad, J. Chabé, Y. Fantéi-Caujolle, C. Renaud, and C. Giordano, “A generalized differential image motion monitor,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 915-925 (2019).
    CrossRef
  19. Korea Astronomy and Space Science Insititude, “Bohyunsan Optical Astronomy Observatory,” (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Insititude), https://www.kasi.re.kr/eng/pageView/65 (Accessed Date: Jun. 1, 2023)
  20. H. Lim, M. Choi, E. Park, S. Yu, K. Seong, and J. Park, “The New Korean SLR System and Its Automatic Operation,” in Proc. ILRS Technical Workshop (Riga, Latvia, Oct. 2-5, 2017).
  21. J. H. Lee, S. J. Ro, K. Kim, T. Butterley, R. Wilson, Y. Choi, and S. Lee, “Robotic SLODAR development for seeing evaluations at the Bohyunsan Observatory,” in Proc. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference (Maui, Hawai'i, Sep. 15-18, 2015), p. poster no. 26.
  22. J. H. Lee, S. Shin, G. N. Park, H. Rhee, and H. Yang, “Atmospheric turbulence simulator for adaptive optics evaluation on an optical test bench,” Curr. Opt. Photonics 1, 107-112 (2017).
    CrossRef
  23. H.-C. Lim, K.-P. Sung, S.-Y. Yu, M. Choi, E. Park, J.-U. Park, C.-S. Choi, and S. Kim, “Satellite laser ranging system at Geochang Station,” J. Astron. Space Sci. 35, 253-261 (2018).
    CrossRef
  24. M. Wilkinson, U. Schreiber, I. Procházka, C. Moore, J. Degnan, G. Kirchner, Z. Zhongping, P. Dunn, V. Shargorodskiy, M. Sadovniokov, C. Courde, and H. Kunimori, “The next generation of satellite laser ranging systems,” J. Geod. 93, 2227-2247 (2019).
    CrossRef
  25. Plane wave instrument, “CDK 20 optical tube assembly,” (Plan wave product), https://planewave.com/product/cdk20-optical-tube-assembly-f-7-77/ (Accessed Date: Oct. 1, 2023)
  26. Oxford instruments, “iXon life,” (Oxford Instruments ANDOR), https://andor.oxinst.com/assets/uploads/products/andor/documents/andor-ixon-life-emccd-specifications.pdf (Accessed Date: Jul. 1, 2023)
  27. S. Thomas, “Optimized centroid computing in a Shack-Hartmann sensor,” Proc. SPIE 5490, 1238 (2004).
    CrossRef
  28. Korea Meteorological Administration, “Automated synoptic observing system (ASOS) data,” (KMA Weather Data Service: Open MET data portal), https://data.kma.go.kr/data/grnd/selectAsosList.do?pgmNo=34 (Accessed Date: Oct. 17, 2023)

Article

Research Paper

Curr. Opt. Photon. 2024; 8(1): 30-37

Published online February 25, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Copyright © Optical Society of Korea.

SLODAR System Development for Vertical Atmospheric Disturbance Profiling at Geochang Observatory

Ji Yong Joo1, Hyeon Seung Ha1, Jun Ho Lee1,2 , Do Hwan Jung1,3, Young Soo Kim1,3, Timothy Butterley4

1Department of Optical Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonan 31080, Korea
2Institute of Application and Fusion for Light, Kongju National University, Cheonan 31080, Korea
3Electro-Optical Team, Hanwha Systems Co., Seongnam 13524, Korea
4Department of Physics, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom

Correspondence to:*jhlsat@kongju.ac.kr, ORCID 0000-0002-4075-3504

Received: November 22, 2023; Revised: December 11, 2023; Accepted: December 20, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Implemented at the Geochang Observatory in South Korea, our slope detection and ranging (SLODAR) system features a 508 mm Cassegrain telescope (f/7.8), incorporating two Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensors (WFS) for precise measurements of atmospheric phase distortions, particularly from nearby binary or double stars, utilizing an 8 × 8 grid of sampling points. With an ability to reconstruct eight-layer vertical atmospheric profiles, the system quantifies the refractive index structure function (Cn2) through the crossed-beam method. Adaptable in vertical profiling altitude, ranging from a few hundred meters to several kilometers, contingent on the separation angle of binary stars, the system operates in both wide (2.5 to 12.5 arcminute separation angle) and narrow modes (11 to 15 arcsecond separation angle), covering altitudes from 122.3 to 611.5 meters and 6.1 to 8.3 kilometers, respectively. Initial measurements at the Geochang Observatory indicated Cn2 values up to 181.7 meters with a Fried parameter (r0) of 8.4 centimeters in wide mode and up to 7.8 kilometers with an r0 of 8.0 centimeters in narrow mode, suggesting similar seeing conditions to the Bohyun Observatory and aligning with a comparable 2014–2015 seeing profiling campaign in South Korea.

Keywords: Adaptive optics, Atmospheric turbulence, Fried parameter, Refractive index structure function (Cn2), SLODAR

I. INTRODUCTION

Many observatories that operate adaptive optics (AO) use vertical atmospheric turbulence profiling for site evaluation, adaptive optics design and operation, and optimization [16]. In addition, real-time vertical turbulence profiling is also required for various AO algorithms, such as three-dimensional (3D) tomography wavefront reconstruction, optimal conjugate altitude search, and image post-processing tasks related to point spread function reconstruction. As a result, real-time vertical atmospheric turbulence profiling is very important for AO [79].

There are several instruments for measuring atmospheric turbulence profiles, each with its own advantages and limitations in terms of cost, vertical resolution, altitude range, and ease of implementation [918]. These include slope detection and ranging (SLODAR) [913], scintillation detection and ranging (SCIDAR) [1416], differential image motion monitor (DIMM) [17, 18], and multi-aperture scintillation sensor (MASS) [17]. Especially, the SLODAR method, proposed by Wilson [10] in 2002, is valued for its cost-effectiveness in manufacturing and its efficacy in measuring turbulence profiles, making it widely utilized in many astronomical observatories [913].

There are several astronomical observatories in Korea, including the Bohyun and Geochang Observatories [19, 20]. Notably, the Bohyun Observatory is home to Korea’s largest ground-based 1.8 m telescope, while the Geochang Observatory is dedicated to satellite laser ranging with a 1.0 m SLR telescope [20]. Regarding astronomical seeing evaluation, there are several reports on the Bohyun Observatory, including a seeing campaign carried out with a similar SLODAR system as reported herein for one year starting in June 2014 [21, 22]. However, there are no reports on atmospheric seeing evaluation at the Geochang Observatory, which is essential for further improvement in measurement accuracy, potentially aided by the use of adaptive optics [23, 24]. In response to this gap, we have taken the initiative to develop and install an atmospheric vertical seeing profiler utilizing a SLODAR for the Geochang Observatory.

In Section 2, we present a comprehensive overview of SLODAR technology and its development. Section 3 reports on the initial observation results, and Section 4 serves as the concluding section for this paper.

II. SLODAR development

2.1. Principles

In 2002, Wilson proposed the SLODAR method, a technique reconstructing vertical optical turbulence profiles through cross-covariance measurements from two Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensors (WFS) measurements for a pair of nearby stars, known as the crossed-beam method [10]. Figure 1 illustrates the schematic concept of the crossed-beam method. Within this technique, the vertical resolution (δh) and the maximum measurement altitude (Hmax) are defined as below:

Figure 1. Schematic diagram illustrating the crossed-beam method. This specific diagram depicts the construction of 8 layers of vertical profiling with 8 sub-aperture wavefront sensing [13].

δh=ω/θ,
Hmax=N1×δh,

where θ represents the angular separation of the stars, and ω is the size of the sub-aperture in the wavefront sensing. N denotes the number of sub-apertures. Increasing the separation angle of the binary stars enhances vertical resolution but reduces the maximum altitude [913].

The SLODAR consists of a telecentric lens, a prism mirror, and two WFSs, and is attached to the rear end of the telescope. The prism mirror reflects the binary stars at a 45° onto the WFSs. Each WFS is composed of a collimating lens, a micro lens array (MLA), and an electron multiplying-charge coupled device (EM-CCD). Figure 2 shows the optical schematic of the SLODAR.

Figure 2. Optical schematic of the SLODAR [13].

In the crossed-beam method, the number of turbulence profiling layers is determined by the number of sub-apertures on the WFS laid in the telescope pupil, and the altitude is determined by the separation angle of the binary star. SLODAR operates in two modes based on this separation angle: The wide mode for measuring turbulence at lower altitudes and the narrow mode for higher altitudes [13]. In the narrow mode, where the separation angle is very narrow, binary stars cannot be separated using a prism mirror, so two focal points are placed per MLA pitch using a single WFS. For the wide mode, the binary stars can be sufficiently separated by the prism mirror, placing one focal point per MLA pitch, and utilizing two WFSs. Figures 3 and 4 show the optical layouts and WFS images for both modes.

Figure 3. Optical schematics of the two SLODAR operation modes: (a) wide and (b) narrow.

Figure 4. Wave-front sensors (WFS) images of the two SLODAR operation modes: (a) wide and (b) narrow.

In the crossed-beam method, the layer turbulence profile is reconstructed from the cross-covariance of the binary star phase slope, while the overall turbulence profile is reconstructed from the auto-covariance of the single star phase slope [13]. The formulas for cross-covariance and auto-covariance are as given by:

Cδi,δj= i,js i,jt si+δi,j+δjt/Oδi,δj,
Aδi,δj= i,js i,jtsi+δi,j+δjt/Oδi,δj.

Here, ensemble < > refers to the average over frames and si,j(t) denotes the slope of the sub-aperture (i, j) at time t. s′ represents the slope of the second star, and O(δi, δj) denotes the number of overlapped pixels for (δi, δj). Finally, the measured covariance can be compared with the reference covariance applied with the Kolmogorov model to estimate the atmospheric turbulence profile.

2.2. Initial Design

The SLODAR’s initial design is crucial to the overall performance and efficiency of the system. The initial design of SLODAR, which includes the selection of the collimating lens and MLA, can be conducted based on the specifications of the telescope and EM-CCD. We utilized a corrected Dall-Kirkham (CDK) type telescope with a diameter of 508 mm and an EM-CCD known for its extremely low spurious noise. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the specifications of the telescope and the EM-CCD, respectively [25, 26].

TABLE 1. Telescope specifications [25].

ParameterValue
ModelCDK 20
TypeCDK
Primary Mirror Diameter (mm)508
Secondary Mirror Diameter (mm)191
Focal Ratiof/7.77
Focal Length (mm)3,951
Back Focal Length (mm)269
Image Scale (arcsec/mm)52.2
Weight (kg)63.5


TABLE 2. EM-CCD specifications [26].

ParameterValue
ModelAndor iXon Life 897
Active Pixels512 × 512
Pixel Size (μm)16 × 16
Active Pixel Well Depth180,000 e-
Gain Register Pixel Well Depth800,000 e-
Max Readout Rate (MHz)17
Frame Rate (fps)56
Readout Noise (NR)<1 e-
Dark Current (ND)0.0003 e-/pix/sec


We require a collimated beam size of MLA pitch × 8 at the WFS to measure an 8-layer atmospheric profile. The collimating lens focal length can be determined by considering the collimated beam diameter, denoted as DC.B., and the telescope F-number, represented as F/#Tele..

fcoll.=F/#Tele. ×DC.B.

The MLA can be optimally selected by considering the sampling ratio in the WFS. To calculate the sampling ratio, which is the number of pixels per FWHM (Full Width at Half Maximum), both the diffraction limited FWHM and the WFS image scale are required. The diffraction limited FWHM can be calculated using the diameter of the sub-aperture, denoted as ω, and the wavelength [24]. D.L. represents the diffraction limit in arcsec units, and lambda corresponds to the V-band (550 nm) [13].

D.L.=206265×1.22×λ/ω.

The I.S.WFS represents the WFS image scale in arcsec/pixel, and the sampling ratio, denoted as S.R., can be calculated by dividing the D.L. by the I.S.WFS. P represents the pixel size.

I.S.WFS=I.S.Tele.×P×fcoll./fMLA,
S.R.=0.5×D.L./I.S.WFS.

A sampling ratio of approximately 1.5 is suitable for centroid calculation [27]. The collimating lens was selected with a focal length of 30 mm, and the MLA was chosen with a pitch of 500 µm and a focal length of 32.8 mm.

2.3. Optimization

Sufficient illumination is required in the WFS images for centroid computation. Considering the obstruction, it is necessary to use more than 40 focal points with sufficient illumination in the 8 × 8 MLA area. We determined the collimated beam diameter to be approximately 4.25 mm to ensure that the illumination was above 0.7 for more than 40 focal points. Illumination can be verified through the coordinates on the MLA plane represented by x, and the radius of the collimated beam represented by r.

Illumination=x1x2 x2r2 dx.

In the SLODAR design, telescope telecentricity is essential [13]. Using Eq (4), the Focal ratio including the telecentric lens can be determined. We designed the telecentric lens to achieve a Focal ratio of f /7.06. Figure 5 shows the optical schematic of the SLODAR without the prism mirror and the illumination of the 40 focal points observed on the MLA plane.

Figure 5. SLODAR design: (a) SLODAR optical schematic without the prism mirror, and (b) illumination on the micro lens array (MLA) plane.

Additionally, for accurate altitude turbulence measurements, conjugation is required between the MLA and the telescope pupil. Without conjugation, the turbulence strength measured at the ground (0 m) could have an error of several meters from the actual altitude. The conjugation design was carried out by placing the MLA at a stop pupil position.

The optimized SLODAR can determine the observable separation angle of binary stars. The dimensions of the prism mirror determine the range of separation angles for binary stars observable in wide mode. In narrow mode, the range of observable separation angles for binary stars is determined by the MLA pitch. The determined separation angles are 2.5–12.5 arcmin for wide mode and 11–15 arcsec for narrow mode. Figure 6 shows the final developed SLODAR, and Table 3 presents the SLODAR specifications.

Figure 6. Telescope and SLODAR image.

TABLE 3. SLODAR specifications.

Target SeparationWide Mode2.5–12.5 arcmin
Narrow Mode11–15 arcsec
No. of Measurements Layer8
CCD Exposure Time (ms) (Frame Rate: 56 Hz)3
Minimum Elevation (°)45
Minimum Moon-target Separation (°)15


All instruments are controlled from the operator room, located a few meters away from the dome. The operator room is equipped with a workstation, telescope controller, stage controller, and network power controller. The workstation not only controls the instruments, but also stores data, and performs atmospheric turbulence calculations using algorithms. Figure 7 shows the SLODAR system.

Figure 7. SLODAR system overview: (a) Telescope, (b) SLODAR, (c) workstation, and (d) dome.

2.4. Observation

The operation of the SLODAR system proceeds in the following order: Checking ambient conditions, selecting, and pointing to the target, and data measurement.

The observer must ensure that two conditions are satisfied (humidity <70% and wind speed <13 m/s) before opening the dome. High humidity can cause dew to form on the optical system, and strong winds can cause the telescope to shake, making observation difficult [13].

After opening the dome, the operator should select and point to the target. The target is chosen from a list of binary stars, which has been compiled from the Tycho-2 star catalogue and the Washington double star catalogue, containing observable binary stars. The list of binary stars primarily used at the Geochang SLR Observatory is presented in Table 4, and the observation conditions are as follows:

TABLE 4. Primary targets list at Geochang SLR Observatory (35°35’24.0”N 127°55’12.0”E).

ModeBinary Star IDSeparation AngleHmax (δh) (m)
Wide Mode03-02a3.3’458.9 (65.6)
08-13a8.4’181.7 (25.9)
10-10a10.2’150.3 (21.5)
Narrow ModeSTF196211.7”7,836.3 (1,119.5)
STF33112.0”7,640.4 (1,091.5)
STF2280AB14.3”6,411.5 (915.9)


(1) Binary stars within the target separation range,

(2) Binary stars with an apparent magnitude of 7 or less,

(3) Binary stars located more than 15 degrees from the moon,

(4) Binary stars with an elevation angle of 45 degrees or higher.

After selecting and pointing to the target, we begin measuring the slope using binary stars. When using wide mode, we measure the slope from each of the two WFS. In narrow mode, we measure the slopes from a single WFS. For narrow mode, the MLA pitch is divided horizontally into two sections, and the slope is measured for each area. The exposure time during measurement is 3 ms, and we store the slope data in packets, with each packet containing 1,000 frames. If the target’s elevation angle drops below 45 degrees or if observation becomes difficult, we switch to a different target and resume measurement.

III. First observation results

3.1. Site Description

The Geochang SLR Observatory is located on the top of Mt. Gamak, which is located near to the city of Geochang, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea. Its coordinates are 35°35’24.0”N 127°55’12.0”E, and it stands at an elevation of 952 meters. Figure 8 shows the location of the Geochang SLR Observatory.

Figure 8. Geochang SLR Observatory location on maps.

The observatory often receives heavy fog from late spring through early autumn due to its proximity to a fully filled water reservoir located 3.5 kilometers away. Especially from June to September, the average humidity exceeds 70%, and high precipitation imposes limitations on observations. As a result, the primary period for observations at the observatory is mainly from late autumn to mid-spring.

Figure 9 presents the monthly variation of the main meteorological conditions in Geochang. This graph is derived from 30 years of historical observation data by the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) from 1992 to 2022 [28]. These results are very similar to the meteorological conditions at the Bohyun Observatory.

Figure 9. Monthly variations of temperature, precipitation, and humidity of Geochang: (a) Recent 30-year average temperature and precipitation graph, (b) recent 30-year average humidity graph.

3.2. Initial Observation

We conducted initial observations at the Geochang SLR Observatory on June 16, 2023, utilizing wide and narrow measurement modes. The observations were conducted sequentially, with a 1-hour separation, over 30 minutes each. In the wide mode, observations were performed with a binary star of 8.4’ angular separation (ID 08-13a) from 21:30 to 22:00 local time. Subsequently, narrow mode observations were conducted from 23:00 to 23:30 local time with a binary star of 11.7” angular separation (STF 1962). Figure 10 displays the sampled auto-covariance and cross-covariance for the wide binary star (ID 08-13a) with two components referred to as left and right, as defined in Eqs. (3) and (4).

Figure 10. Sampled auto-covariance and cross-covariance of the wide binary star (ID 08-13a).

From each observation, ten mean turbulence profiles were derived over 3 minutes using the method described in Section 2.1. Throughout this period, the statistical properties of atmospheric disturbance can be considered as not varying.

Firstly, Fig. 11 illustrates the measured Fried parameter (r0) for both wide and narrow modes. The average values over 30 minutes are 8.8 cm for the wide mode and 8.4 cm for the narrow mode. This suggests that the overall seeing strength did not change significantly during the two hours of observation. The number of observations is too few to reach any conclusions. However, regarding the overall seeing strength in terms of the Fried parameter (r0), the mean value at the SLR site aligns well with the statistical distribution of the seeing conditions observed at the Bohyun Observatory, which has a mean value of 8.28 cm with a standard deviation of 2.25 cm [21].

Figure 11. Initial measurements of Fried parameter (ro) using wide and narrow measurement modes, sequentially over 30 minutes each. Each data point represents the mean value over 3 minutes.

Secondly, Fig. 12 displays ten Cn2 profiles along with their mean profile obtained from the wide mode. The wide mode allowed us to capture detailed Cn2 vertical profiles near the ground, a crucial aspect for wide-field AO or ground AO imaging. The specific measurement covered an altitude range of 181.1 meters with an increment of 25.9 meters. The results indicate that the most significant atmospheric disturbance occurs around the ground layer, with a few weaker layers observed around 50 meters in altitude.

Figure 12. Initial Cn2 profiles over 30 minutes from wide modes. (a) Ten mean Cn2 profiles, (b) overall mean Cn2 profiles.

Similarly, Fig. 13 displays ten Cn2 profiles along with their mean profile obtained from the narrow mode. The narrow mode enabled the capture of overall Cn2 vertical profiles up to 5–10 km, providing crucial information for estimating the scintillation effect caused by high wind speeds around high altitudes. The specific measurement covered an altitude range of 5.7 kilometers with an increment of 814 meters. The narrow mode measurement also confirmed that the most significant atmospheric disturbance occurs around the ground layer. However, it revealed a few weaker layers observed around 4 km and 6 km altitudes.

Figure 13. Initial Cn2 profiles over 30 minutes from narrow modes. (a) Ten mean Cn2 profiles, (b) overall mean Cn2 profiles.

IV. Conclusion

We developed the SLODAR system at the Geochang SLR Observatory in South Korea to characterize turbulence profiles. The SLODAR system, featuring a 508 mm Cassegrain telescope, reconstructs an eight-layer vertical atmospheric profile. Initial observations were conducted at the Geochang SLR Observatory on June 16, 2023, operating in both wide and narrow modes for 30 minutes each. The average Fried parameter over 30 minutes is 8.8 cm for the wide mode and 8.4 cm for the narrow mode. Additionally, strong turbulence was found in the ground layer for both modes. These findings indicate similar observational conditions to those at the Bohyun Observatory, and we plan to continue real-time vertical atmospheric turbulence profiling at the Geochang SLR Observatory for over a year.

FUNDING

The research grant of the Kongju National University in 2022; the DRATRI grant funded by DAPA (Laser guide star adaptive optics, Grant no. UC200014D*).

DISCLOSURES

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time, but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Schematic diagram illustrating the crossed-beam method. This specific diagram depicts the construction of 8 layers of vertical profiling with 8 sub-aperture wavefront sensing [13].
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Optical schematic of the SLODAR [13].
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Optical schematics of the two SLODAR operation modes: (a) wide and (b) narrow.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Wave-front sensors (WFS) images of the two SLODAR operation modes: (a) wide and (b) narrow.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 5.

Figure 5.SLODAR design: (a) SLODAR optical schematic without the prism mirror, and (b) illumination on the micro lens array (MLA) plane.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 6.

Figure 6.Telescope and SLODAR image.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 7.

Figure 7.SLODAR system overview: (a) Telescope, (b) SLODAR, (c) workstation, and (d) dome.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 8.

Figure 8.Geochang SLR Observatory location on maps.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 9.

Figure 9.Monthly variations of temperature, precipitation, and humidity of Geochang: (a) Recent 30-year average temperature and precipitation graph, (b) recent 30-year average humidity graph.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 10.

Figure 10.Sampled auto-covariance and cross-covariance of the wide binary star (ID 08-13a).
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 11.

Figure 11.Initial measurements of Fried parameter (ro) using wide and narrow measurement modes, sequentially over 30 minutes each. Each data point represents the mean value over 3 minutes.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 12.

Figure 12.Initial Cn2 profiles over 30 minutes from wide modes. (a) Ten mean Cn2 profiles, (b) overall mean Cn2 profiles.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

Fig 13.

Figure 13.Initial Cn2 profiles over 30 minutes from narrow modes. (a) Ten mean Cn2 profiles, (b) overall mean Cn2 profiles.
Current Optics and Photonics 2024; 8: 30-37https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2024.8.1.30

TABLE 1 Telescope specifications [25]

ParameterValue
ModelCDK 20
TypeCDK
Primary Mirror Diameter (mm)508
Secondary Mirror Diameter (mm)191
Focal Ratiof/7.77
Focal Length (mm)3,951
Back Focal Length (mm)269
Image Scale (arcsec/mm)52.2
Weight (kg)63.5

TABLE 2 EM-CCD specifications [26]

ParameterValue
ModelAndor iXon Life 897
Active Pixels512 × 512
Pixel Size (μm)16 × 16
Active Pixel Well Depth180,000 e-
Gain Register Pixel Well Depth800,000 e-
Max Readout Rate (MHz)17
Frame Rate (fps)56
Readout Noise (NR)<1 e-
Dark Current (ND)0.0003 e-/pix/sec

TABLE 3 SLODAR specifications

Target SeparationWide Mode2.5–12.5 arcmin
Narrow Mode11–15 arcsec
No. of Measurements Layer8
CCD Exposure Time (ms) (Frame Rate: 56 Hz)3
Minimum Elevation (°)45
Minimum Moon-target Separation (°)15

TABLE 4 Primary targets list at Geochang SLR Observatory (35°35’24.0”N 127°55’12.0”E)

ModeBinary Star IDSeparation AngleHmax (δh) (m)
Wide Mode03-02a3.3’458.9 (65.6)
08-13a8.4’181.7 (25.9)
10-10a10.2’150.3 (21.5)
Narrow ModeSTF196211.7”7,836.3 (1,119.5)
STF33112.0”7,640.4 (1,091.5)
STF2280AB14.3”6,411.5 (915.9)

References

  1. R. Wilson, “Results of the JOSE site evaluation project for adaptive optics at the William Herschel Telescope,” New Astron. Rev. 42, 465-469 (1998).
    CrossRef
  2. B. L. Ellerbroek and F. J. Rigaut, “Scaling multiconjugate adaptive optics performance estimates to extremely large telescopes,” Proc. SPIE 4007, 1088-1099 (2000).
    CrossRef
  3. A. Tokovinin, “Seeing Improvement with Ground-Layer Adaptive Optics,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 116, 941-951 (2004).
    CrossRef
  4. L. Wang, M. Schöck, and G. Chanan, “Atmospheric turbulence profiling with SLODAR using multiple adaptive optics wavefront sensors,” Appl. Opt. 47, 1880-1892 (2008).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. L. Y. Liu, Y. Q. Yao, J. Vernin, H. S. Wang, J. Yin, and X. Qian, “Multi-instrument characterization of optical turbulence at the Ali observatory,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 595, 012019 (2015).
    CrossRef
  6. Y. H. Ono, C. M. Correia, D. R. Andersen, O. Lardière, S. Oya, M. Akiyama, K. Jackson, and C. Bradley, “Statistics of turbulence parameters at Mauna Kea using the multiple wavefront sensor data of RAVEN,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 465, 4931-4941 (2017).
    CrossRef
  7. F. Vidal, E. Gendron, M. Brangier, A. Sevin, G. Rousset, and Z. Hubert, “Tomography reconstruction using the Learn and Apply algorithm,” in Proc. 1st AO4ELT conference (Paris, France, Jun. 22-26, 2009), p. article no. 07001.
    CrossRef
  8. L. Gilles and B. L. Ellerbroek, “Real-time turbulence profiling with a pair of laser guide star shack hartmann wavefront sensors for wide-field adaptive optics systems on large to extremely large telescopes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 76-83 (2010).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. A. Y. Shikhovtsev, P. G. Kovadlo, A. V. Kiselev, D. Y. Kolobov, V. P. Lukin, I. V. Russkikh, and M. Y. Shikhovtsev, “Modified method to detect the turbulent layers in the atmospheric boundary layer for the large solar vacuum telescope,” Atmosphere 12, 159 (2021).
    CrossRef
  10. R. W. Wilson, “SLODAR: measuring optical turbulence altitude with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 337, 103-108 (2002).
    CrossRef
  11. T. Butterley, R. W. Wilson, and M. Sarazin, “Determination of the profile of atmospheric optical turbulence strength from SLODAR data,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 369, 835-845 (2006).
    CrossRef
  12. M. Goodwin, C. Jenkins, and A. Lambert, “Improved detection of atmospheric turbulence with SLODAR,” Opt. Express 15, 14844-14860 (2007).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. T. Butterley, R. W. Wilson, M. Sarazin, C. M. Dubbeldam, J. Osborn, and P. Clark, “Characterization of the ground layer of turbulence at Paranal using a robotic SLODAR System,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492, 934-949 (2020).
    CrossRef
  14. J. Vernin and F. Roddier, “Experimental determination of two-dimensional spatiotemporal power spectra of stellar light scintillation evidence for a multilayer structure of the air turbulence in the upper troposphere,” Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 270-273 (1973).
    CrossRef
  15. R. Avila, J. L. Avilés, R. Wilson, M. Chun, T. Butterley, and E. Carrasco, “LOLAS: An optical turbulence profiler in the atmospheric boundary layer with extreme altitude-resolution,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 387, 1511-1516 (2008).
    CrossRef
  16. H. W. Shepherd, J. Osborn, R. W. Wilson, T. Butterley, R. Avila, V. S. Dhillon, and T. J. Morris, “Stereo-SCIDAR: Optical turbulence profiling with high sensitivity using a modified SCIDAR instrument,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, 3568-3577 (2014).
    CrossRef
  17. A. Tokovinin and V. Kornilov, “Accurate seeing measurements with MASS and DIMM,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 381, 1179-1189 (2007).
    CrossRef
  18. E. Aristidi, A. Ziad, J. Chabé, Y. Fantéi-Caujolle, C. Renaud, and C. Giordano, “A generalized differential image motion monitor,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 915-925 (2019).
    CrossRef
  19. Korea Astronomy and Space Science Insititude, “Bohyunsan Optical Astronomy Observatory,” (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Insititude), https://www.kasi.re.kr/eng/pageView/65 (Accessed Date: Jun. 1, 2023)
  20. H. Lim, M. Choi, E. Park, S. Yu, K. Seong, and J. Park, “The New Korean SLR System and Its Automatic Operation,” in Proc. ILRS Technical Workshop (Riga, Latvia, Oct. 2-5, 2017).
  21. J. H. Lee, S. J. Ro, K. Kim, T. Butterley, R. Wilson, Y. Choi, and S. Lee, “Robotic SLODAR development for seeing evaluations at the Bohyunsan Observatory,” in Proc. Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference (Maui, Hawai'i, Sep. 15-18, 2015), p. poster no. 26.
  22. J. H. Lee, S. Shin, G. N. Park, H. Rhee, and H. Yang, “Atmospheric turbulence simulator for adaptive optics evaluation on an optical test bench,” Curr. Opt. Photonics 1, 107-112 (2017).
    CrossRef
  23. H.-C. Lim, K.-P. Sung, S.-Y. Yu, M. Choi, E. Park, J.-U. Park, C.-S. Choi, and S. Kim, “Satellite laser ranging system at Geochang Station,” J. Astron. Space Sci. 35, 253-261 (2018).
    CrossRef
  24. M. Wilkinson, U. Schreiber, I. Procházka, C. Moore, J. Degnan, G. Kirchner, Z. Zhongping, P. Dunn, V. Shargorodskiy, M. Sadovniokov, C. Courde, and H. Kunimori, “The next generation of satellite laser ranging systems,” J. Geod. 93, 2227-2247 (2019).
    CrossRef
  25. Plane wave instrument, “CDK 20 optical tube assembly,” (Plan wave product), https://planewave.com/product/cdk20-optical-tube-assembly-f-7-77/ (Accessed Date: Oct. 1, 2023)
  26. Oxford instruments, “iXon life,” (Oxford Instruments ANDOR), https://andor.oxinst.com/assets/uploads/products/andor/documents/andor-ixon-life-emccd-specifications.pdf (Accessed Date: Jul. 1, 2023)
  27. S. Thomas, “Optimized centroid computing in a Shack-Hartmann sensor,” Proc. SPIE 5490, 1238 (2004).
    CrossRef
  28. Korea Meteorological Administration, “Automated synoptic observing system (ASOS) data,” (KMA Weather Data Service: Open MET data portal), https://data.kma.go.kr/data/grnd/selectAsosList.do?pgmNo=34 (Accessed Date: Oct. 17, 2023)