검색
검색 팝업 닫기

Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords

Article

Split Viewer

Research Paper

Curr. Opt. Photon. 2023; 7(6): 665-672

Published online December 25, 2023 https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2023.7.6.665

Copyright © Optical Society of Korea.

Impact of the Spectral Linewidth of a Pseudorandom Binary Sequence (PRBS)-Modulated Laser on Stimulated Brillouin Scattering and Beam Quality

Aeri Jung1, Sanggwon Song1, Kwang Hyun Lee2, Jung Hwan Lee2, Kyunghwan Oh1

1Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
2Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon 34186, Korea

Corresponding author: *koh@yonsei.ac.kr, ORCID 0000-0003-2544-0216

Received: April 10, 2023; Revised: October 20, 2023; Accepted: October 23, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This study focuses on investigating the impact of the spectral linewidth of a seed laser in a master-oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) configuration on stimulated Brillouin scattering and the beam quality of the output diffracted by a grating. To conduct the study, a distributed feedback (DFB) laser is modulated in a pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS) and amplified by a two-stage Yb-doped fiber amplifier to achieve an output power of over 1 kW. The spectral linewidth of the seed laser is systematically varied from 1 to 12 GHz in the frequency domain by varying the PRBS modulation parameters. The experimental results reveal a tradeoff between suppressing stimulated Brillouin scattering and enhancing beam quality with increased spectral linewidth. Therefore, the study provides valuable insights into optimizing spectral beam combining to achieve high beam quality and scalable power upgrade in fiber lasers.

Keywords: Fiber laser, Linewidth, Pseudorandom binary sequence, Spectral beam combining, Stimulated Brillouin scattering

OCIS codes: (050.0050) Diffraction and gratings; (060.3510) Lasers, fiber; (140.3298) Laser beam combining; (290.3700) Linewidth; (290.5900) Scattering, stimulated Brillouin

Yb-doped fiber laser systems have been rapidly developed for various industrial and military laser applications, facilitating the production of high-quality laser beams with power-scaled output power [13]. There have been recent attempts to increase Yb-doped fiber laser (YDF-laser) power even further, which include the use of the master-oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) configuration [4, 5] and beam-combining technologies [6, 7]. Among these technologies, beam combining the outputs from the MOPA has shown high feasibility for YDF-laser power scaling [8, 9]. However, this scheme requires multistage amplification and faces various technological bottlenecks, such as thermal effects [10], stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) [11], stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) [12], photodarkening [13], and transverse mode instability (TMI) [14].

The issue of SBS has been a persistent problem in laser systems, particularly in MOPA architectures. SBS is a phenomenon in which the light wave interacting with an acoustic phonon in the optical waveguide creates a backward-propagating wave that can damage the laser system and limit the output power [11, 1518]. To mitigate the effects of SBS, various techniques have been proposed. One of the most widely used techniques is spectral linewidth broadening [19]. This technique involves adding a phase modulation component to the seed laser components, which can increase the threshold power of SBS with radio-frequency (RF) signals, including the white-noise source (WNS) [20] and pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS) [21]. This technique has been shown to be effective in increasing the SBS threshold in MOPA systems. Another technique is the use of short-length large-mode area fibers [22] and a structural design of optical fiber [23]. These can help to reduce the acoustic phonon density in the fiber, which can lower the SBS threshold power. In spectral-linewidth-broadening schemes, the use of PRBS modulation has been preferred over WNS, as it provides a higher SBS threshold. PRBS modulation has been successfully employed in YDF-MOPA to achieve kilowatt-class laser power [12, 24, 25].

In addition to the issue of SBS, the spectral linewidth of lasers is also a critical parameter in beam-combining technologies, which is another avenue of laser power scaling. In particular, spectral beam combining (SBC) requires multiple lasers to overlap in both the spatial and spectral domains, with each laser having a narrow spectral linewidth to avoid undesirable interference among them [26]. Broad spectral linewidth of a laser can result in significant chromatic dispersion at a diffraction grating, which can adversely affect beam quality in SBC [2729]. Therefore, finding an optimal amount of spectral broadening that can satisfy both SBS suppression and SBC enhancement is essential. Beam-combining technologies have been adopted for the outputs from MOPA configurations to increase the net output power several times without noticeable beam-quality degradation, compared to single-channel power-scaling attempts [30, 31]. However, it is not yet clear how the spectral linewidth would affect both SBS and the beam quality of SBC in YDF-MOPA systems. Further research is needed to determine the optimal spectral linewidth for SBC in YDF-MOPA systems. This involves investigating the tradeoff between SBS suppression and SBC enhancement, and determining the effect of spectral linewidth on beam quality. By finding the optimal spectral linewidth, it is possible to achieve high net output powers while maintaining excellent beam quality, which is essential for many applications, including laser processing and medical treatments.

This paper presents an experimental analysis of the impacts of the spectral linewidth of a single-channel YDF-MOPA on SBS and beam quality. The YDF-MOPA system consists of a distributed feedback (DFB) laser diode modulated in PRBS formats, and two-stage YDF amplifiers that increase the continuous-wave (CW) output power to over one kilowatt. To investigate the effects of spectral linewidth, the back-reflected SBS power from the final-state YDF amplifier is measured, and the beam quality is measured for the output laser diffracted by a grating. The grating specifications used in the experiment are chosen to be similar to those used in SBC, enabling the experimental configuration to be readily adopted for multichannel SBC. The experimental findings provide valuable information for designing multiwavelength SBC systems using MOPA configurations. By understanding the effects of spectral linewidth on both SBS and beam quality, it is possible to optimize the system design and achieve high net output powers while maintaining excellent beam quality. These results can have significant implications for laser processing and medical treatments, where high-power laser systems with excellent beam quality are crucial.

Figure 1 depicts the experimental setups employed to assess the impact of linewidth on a YDF-laser system. The diagram exhibits a systematic outline of the different stages of the experiment, which commences with the generation of a PRBS signal utilized for the phase modulation of the seed beam.

Figure 1.Scheme for the radio-frequency (RF) spectrum measurement of (a) pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) signal, (b) the phase modulated laser, and (c) the Yb-doped laser system for the measurement of SBS power and beam quality M 2. The first YDF has a core diameter of 10 μm and a cladding diameter of 125 μm. The second YDF has a core diameter of 15 μm and a cladding diameter of 130 μm. FPGA, field programmable gate array; ESA, electric spectrum analyzer; PM, phase modulator; VOA, variable optical attenuator; PD, photodetector; LD, laser diode; WDM, wavelength division multiplexing.

Figure 1(a) illustrates a detailed schematic of the experimental setup utilized to measure the electrical PRBS signal used for phase modulation of the seed beam. The PRBS signal is generated using a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) board (Altera, Intel FPGA; Intel Co., CA, USA), which generates an RF square-wave signal that is converted to a PRBS signal. To verify the signal generated by the FPGA board, the RF spectrum of the PRBS signal is measured using an electrical spectrum analyzer (ESA). Additionally, a compiled program called Quartus Prime 17.0 (Altera; Intel Co.) is used to change the modulation frequency and PRBS pattern. The modulation frequency is varied within the range of 1 to 12 GHz, and the modulation frequency fm and PRBS pattern n determine the spacing fm/(2n − 1) between frequency combs. This spacing is a critical factor in determining the impact of linewidth on the laser system’s performance. The FPGA board in this experimental setup can generate PRBS patterns 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 17, 23, and 27; PRBS 7 is used in this study, as it offers the best mitigation of SBS under a modulation frequency of 5 GHz.

Figure 1(b) shows a heterodyne setup utilized to measure the increased linewidth of the phase-modulated beam with PRBS signals in the frequency domain. This setup is critical for accurately analyzing dispersion in the grating, as it confirms the increase in linewidth of the phase-modulated beam according to the modulation frequency. The FPGA board used in Fig. 1(a) is also utilized in Figs. 1(b) and 1(c). To modulate the phase of a seed laser with a modulation depth of π, the phase modulator (PM) (NIR-MPX-LN-20; iXblue Inc., CA, USA) requires a voltage of 5.5 V. However, the electrical signal used in the experiment has a power of only 0.1 V. To increase the voltage to the required level, an RF amplifier (DR-DG-20-MO; iXblue Inc.) is used. A DFB laser with a narrow linewidth of 5 MHz and wavelength of 1,064 nm is used as the seed beam. To prevent damage from backward propagation, the beam passes through an isolator. Then, the beam is split into two at a 5:5 coupler, with one part entering the PM and the other serving as the reference beam.

The reference beam is directed through the 5:5 coupler to reduce its power by half due, to the insertion loss of the PM. The beat signal between the modulated and reference beams is measured by ESA. This beat frequency is used to calculate the linewidth of the phase-modulated beam.

Figure 1(c) provides a comprehensive schematic diagram of a YDF-laser system, along with a measurement setup for SBS power and beam quality M 2. The setup includes the components used in Fig. 1(b), such as the DFB laser, FPGA board, RF amplifier, and PM. However, in Fig. 1(c), there are two stages of ytterbium-doped fiber amplifiers (YDFA), to increase the output power. The first stage has a core diameter of 10 μm and a cladding diameter of 125 μm, while the second stage has a larger core diameter of 15 μm and a cladding diameter of 130 μm. To prevent SBS from damaging optical components, optical isolators are placed between the seed laser and PM, and between the first and second stages of YDFA. The SBS power generated in the second stage of YDFA is measured with a power meter. The lens is contained in the endcap, and the laser emitted from the endcap has a diameter of 8 mm, which is maintained until the beam profiler. After adjusting the vertical angle and height of the beam incident upon the grating, the beam quality M 2 is observed using beam-quality measuring equipment (M2-200s; Ophir-Spiricon, UT, USA). The grating has a groove density of 1,740 lines/mm and a diffraction −1th-order efficiency of 99%, to accurately analyze dispersion in the grating [32].

In Fig. 2, the PRBS 7 signals generated by the FPGA board are measured with ESA for modulation frequencies ranging from 1 to 12 GHz. In the frequency domain, the envelope takes on a sinc2 shape, which broadens as the modulation frequency increases. This result is consistent with what is known about PRBS signals [25]. However, the frequency comb of PRBS 7 has intervals of fm/(27 − 1) Hz, which are too small to be seen by the naked eye. Theoretically, the PRBS spectrum should be zero at the modulation frequency, but spikes related to crosstalk signals [33] are observed. Figure 3 also shows these spikes in the modulated laser linewidth.

Figure 2.Pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) 7 signal for modulation frequencies of 1–12 GHz, in the frequency domain.

Figure 3.Spectral linewidth of the modulated beam with pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) 7 signal, in the frequency domain.

In Fig. 3, the linewidth of phase-modulated light in the frequency domain is depicted. To determine whether the modulation frequency increases the linewidth of the phase-modulated light, it is necessary to compare the RF spectra of the PRBS signal and the phase-modulated light, as well as to observe the dispersion of the beam diffracted by the grating due to the linewidth. Upon comparing Figs. 2 and 3, it can be noted that the first envelope’s shape in both spectra is identical. Additionally, the power at the modulation frequency is zero in both spectra. These results show that the modulation frequency broadens the linewidth of the phase-modulated light.

The phase-modulated light is utilized to demonstrate SBS suppression; Figure 4 shows the SBS power as a function of output power for the modulation frequency. The SBS power, achieved using a 99:1 coupler as shown in Fig. 1(c), is of the order of several milliwatts. DFB denotes a narrow-linewidth laser without phase modulation, and the SBS threshold power is observed to be around 5 W. When the linewidth is 1 GHz, it is confirmed that the SBS power rapidly increases near 25 W. This indicates that, in the case of modulation with PRBS, the SBS threshold power is approximately 5 times as high as that without modulation. It is verified that since the enhancement factor is 10 at the modulation frequency of 1 GHz for PRBS 7, as reported in [34], the SBS threshold power may be lower than the predicted power. When the modulation frequency is 3 GHz or higher, there is only a slight difference in the SBS power. Since the SBS threshold power at a modulation frequency of 3 GHz for PRBS 7 is around 3 times that at 1 GHz in [34], it is expected that the SBS threshold power can be confirmed when the output power exceeds 75 W.

Figure 4.Back-reflected stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) power as function of output power at the 2nd ytterbium-doped fiber amplifiers (YDFA), for modulation frequencies of 1–12 GHz. Distributed feedback (DFB) indicates the unmodulated beam.

Figure 5 presents the measured results for beam quality M 2 as a function of the modulation frequency. The x direction is chosen as the direction in which dispersion occurs due to the grooves of the diffraction grating. The analytical solution for beam quality MX2 Eq. (1) is explained in [27], and is modified for cases where the input beam quality is not 1:

Figure 5.Beam quality M 2 as a function of spectral linewidth.

MX2=Mi22+πω0Δλg2λcosα2,

where Mi2 is the input beam quality, ω0 is the input beam’s radius, ∆λ is the linewidth, g is the grating’s groove density of 1,740 lines/mm, λ is the wavelength, and α is the angle of incidence upon the grating. When the laser is incident with radius ω0, divergence angle θ0, and incident angle α, the laser is diffracted with radius ω1, divergence angle θ1, and diffraction angle β. For ∆λ = 0, to first order, a single-mode Gaussian beam is obtained by

M2=ω1θ1ω0θ0 and ω1ω0=θ0θ1=cosβcosα.

The angular spread due to the dispersion is

θ1=ω0ω1θ0+Δθ=ω0ω1θ0+gΔλ2cosβ.

The beam quality for the diffracted beam can be written by

M2=1+gΔλ2θ0cosα.

Assuming the Gaussian linewidth of 1/e2 and Mi2 ≠ 0, the beam quality in the x-direction can be represented by Eq. (1), taking into account the dispersion effect on the linewidth within the grating.

The increase in linewidth results in an increase in beam quality along the diffraction axis (x-direction). Dispersion of the diffracted beam, the input beam quality, and variations in the optical axis due to the vertical angle of the grating, contribute to the difference in beam quality M 2. The vertical angle of the grating is set for beam-path separation, due to the Littrow configuration of the grating [32]. Furthermore, the measured beam quality may be degraded compared to the analytically calculated beam quality with a Gaussian linewidth of 1/e2, since the light is modulated with a discrete frequency comb using PRBS and the linewidth is the full width at half maximum. In this experiment, the beam quality M 2 exceeds 1.5 for linewidths above 3 GHz. However, in practical applications it is imperative to maintain the beam quality M 2 below 1.5 [3537] and analyze the crucial factors leading to its degradation. Variations in the optical axis due to input beam quality and the vertical angle of the grating contribute to an increase in beam quality M 2, in addition to dispersion [28]. Furthermore, the measured beam quality M 2 may degrade compared to the analytically calculated beam quality with a Gaussian linewidth, since the light is modulated with a discrete frequency comb using PRBS. This study is the first to report the measurement of the diffracted-beam quality of a laser modulated with a PRBS signal, in relation to the linewidth.

To summarize, this study has investigated the impact of linewidth on SBS suppression and beam quality in a high-power fiber-laser system. The results indicate that a modulation frequency of 3 GHz is optimal when the output power is in the range of several tens of watts. This modulation frequency allows for SBS mitigation while maintaining beam quality M 2 below 1.5, as demonstrated in Figs. 4 and 5. Previous studies have shown that kilowatt-class lasers can be achieved with SBS mitigation and near-diffraction-limited beam quality, as shown in Table 1. However, little attention has been given to the diffracted-beam quality, which can be degraded by dispersion [38]. The diffracted-beam quality must be considered in a beam-combining system for power scaling to tens of kilowatts. Therefore, it is crucial to optimize the beam quality of high-power fiber-laser systems comprehensively, considering factors such as beam quality before linewidth broadening, mode-field diameter of the YDF, lengths of fibers, and number of combined beams, in consideration of the dispersion effect.

TABLE 1 Yb-doped fiber (YDF)-laser modulated with various radio frequency (RF) signals

RF SignalWavelength (nm)Linewidth (GHz)Power (kW)Beam Quality M 2Diffracted Beam Quality M 2
PRBS 5 [27]1,06431.171.2-
PRBS 8 [39]1,0343.511.1–1.2-
PRBS 7 [40]1,036–1,0717~11.19–1.21-
PRBS 7 [This Work]1,0641~120.031.141.36–2.75
N/A [38]1,060400.011.021.86
WNS [41]1,064.76.51.091.1-
WNS [42]1,064203.251.22-
WNS [43]1,064322.62<1.3-
WNS [44]1,064164.33.961.31-
Sine [45]1,0647.61.081.14-
Sine [46]1,064.4451.891.3-

This study has investigated the impact of linewidth broadening on a YDF-laser system consisting of a master-oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) and SBC, suppressing SBS by phase modulation using a PRBS signal. To achieve this, the spectrum of the PRBS 7 signal generated by an FPGA board and phase-modulated light was measured within a frequency range of 1 to 12 GHz. The results showed that the linewidth increased in proportion to the modulation frequency. Furthermore, through phase modulation using the PRBS signal, the SBS threshold power was increased by more than a factor of 5, compared to the case without modulation, suggesting that linewidth broadening can effectively suppress SBS. However, the study also found that the diffraction-beam quality deteriorated as the linewidth increased. Therefore, the diffraction-beam quality as a function of modulation frequency in the YDF-laser system with phase modulation based on PRBS was measured for the first time. The findings from this study can be applied to improve the power and beam quality of high-power optical-fiber-laser systems.

This work was supported by the Agency For Defense Development by the Korean Government (UD160018RD).

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant, funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2019 R1A2C2011293).

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at the time of publication, but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

  1. Y. Ye, B. Yang, P. Wang, L. Zeng, X. Xi, C. Shi, H. Zhang, X. Wang, P. Zhou, and X. Xu, “Industrial 6 kW high-stability single-stage all-fiber laser oscillator based on conventional large mode area ytterbium-doped fiber,” Laser Phys. 31, 035104 (2021).
    CrossRef
  2. K. Ludewigt, A. Liem, U. Stuhr, and M. Jung, “High-power laser development for laser weapons,” Proc. SPIE 11162, 1116207 (2019).
    CrossRef
  3. M. N. Zervas, “High power ytterbium-doped fiber lasers-fundamentals and applications,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 28, 1442009 (2014).
    CrossRef
  4. Y. Wang, Y. Sun, W. Peng, Y. Feng, J. Wang, Y. Ma, Q. Gao, R. Zhu, and C. Tang, “3.25 kW all-fiberized and polarization-maintained Yb-doped amplifier with a 20 GHz linewidth and near-diffraction-limited beam quality,” Appl. Opt. 60, 6331-6336 (2021).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. P. Zhou, X. Wang, H. Xiao, Y. Ma, and J. Chen, “Review on recent progress on Yb-doped fiber laser in a variety of oscillation spectral ranges,” Laser Phys. 22, 823-831 (2012).
    CrossRef
  6. T. Y. Fan, “Laser beam combining for high-power, high-radiance sources,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 11, 567-577 (2005).
    CrossRef
  7. C. C. Cook and T. Y. Fan, "Spectral beam combining of Yb-doped fiber lasers in an external cavity," in Advanced Solid State Lasers (Optica Publishing Group, 1999), p. paper PD5.
  8. M. Strecker, M. Plötner, F.Stutzki, T.Walbaum, S.Ehrhardt, T. Benkenstein, U. Zeitner, T. Schreiber, R. Eberhardt, A. Tünnermann, U. Stuhr, M. Jung, and K. Ludewigt, “Highly efficient dual-grating 3-channel spectral beam combining of narrow-linewidth monolithic cw Yb-doped fiber amplifiers up to 5.5 kW,” Proc. SPIE 10897, 108970E (2019).
    CrossRef
  9. S. J. McNaught, C. P. Asman, H. Injeyan, A. Jankevics, A. M. F. Johnson, G. C. Jones, H. Komine, J. Machan, J. Marmo, M. McClellan, R. Simpson, J. Sollee, M. M. Valley, M. Weber, and S. Weiss, "100-kW Coherently combined Nd:YAG MOPA laser array," in Frontiers in Optics 2009 (Optica Publishing Group, 2009), p. paper FThD2.
    CrossRef
  10. Z. Xie, S. Fu, Q. Sheng, W. Shi, and J. Yao, “Analysis of thermal effects in high power Yb doped fiber amplifier by distributed pumping,” Proc. SPIE 10457, 104573D (2017).
  11. S. K. Kalyoncu, B. Mete, and A. Yenıay, “Diode-pumped triple-clad fiber MOPA with an output power scaling up to 4.67 kW,” Opt. Lett. 45, 1870-1873 (2020).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Y. Panbiharwala, A. Vasant Harish, Y. Feng, D. Venkitesh, J. Nilsson, and B. Srinivasan, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering mitigation using optimized phase modulation waveforms in high power narrow linewidth Yb-doped fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Express 29, 17183-17200 (2021).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. M. Engholm, M. Tuggle, C. Kucera, T. Hawkins, P. Dragic, and J. Ballato, “On the origin of photodarkening resistance in Yb-doped silica fibers with high aluminum concentration,” Opt. Mater. Express 11, 115-126 (2021).
    CrossRef
  14. Y. Ye, B. Yang, C. Shi, X. Xi, H. Zhang, X. Wang, P. Zhou, and X. Xu, “Towards power improvement of all-Fiber laser oscillators with 30 Μm-core Yb-doped fibers by suppressing transverse mode instability,” Laser Phys. Lett. 17, 085106 (2020).
    CrossRef
  15. E. P. Ippen and R. H. Stolen, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical fibers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 21, 539-541 (1972).
    CrossRef
  16. S. Song, A. Jung, and K. Oh, “High-temperature sensitivity in stimulated Brillouin scattering of 1060 nm single-mode fibers,” Sensors 19, 4731 (2019).
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. O. A. Nieves, M. D. Arnold, M. J. Steel, M. K. Schmidt, and C. G. Poulton, “Noise and pulse dynamics in backward stimulated Brillouin scattering,” Opt. Express 29, 3132-3146 (2021).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. A. Kobyakov, M. Sauer, and D. Chowdhury, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical fibers,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 2, 1-59 (2010).
    CrossRef
  19. T. Li, C. Zha, Y. Sun, Y. Ma, W. Ke, and W. Peng, “3.5 kW bidirectionally pumped narrow-linewidth fiber amplifier seeded by white-noise-source phase-modulated laser,” Laser Phys. 28, 105101 (2018).
    CrossRef
  20. B. Li, M, Liu, Y. Yang, Y. Xian, B. He, and J. Zhou, “Effective Brillouin gain spectra broadening for SBS suppression based on Pseudo random bit sequence phase modulation in fiber system,” IEEE Photonics. J. 13, 7100105 (2021).
    CrossRef
  21. E. Lichtman, R. G. Waarts, and A. A. Friesem, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering excited by a modulated pump wave in single-mode fibers,” J. Light. Technol. 7, 171-174 (1989).
    CrossRef
  22. M. D. Mermelstein, M. J. Andrejco, J. Fini, A. Yablon, C. Headley III, D. J. DiGiovanni, and A. H. McCurdy, “11.2 dB SBS gain suppression in a large mode area Yb-doped optical fiber,” Proc. SPIE 6873, 68730N (2008).
    CrossRef
  23. H. Xiao, G. Ren, Y. Dong, H. Li, S. Xiao, B. Wu, and S. Jian, “A numerical analysis of GeO2-doped multi-step index single-mode fiber for stimulated Brillouin scattering,” J. Opt. 20, 065701 (2018).
    CrossRef
  24. M. Liu, Y. Yang, H. Shen, J. Zhang, X. Zou, H. Wang, L. Yuan, Y. You, G. Bai, B. He, and J. Zhou, “1.27 kW, 2.2 GHz pseudo-random binary sequence phase modulated fiber amplifier with Brillouin gain-spectrum overlap,” Sci. Rep. 10, 629 (2020).
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. A. Flores, C. Robin, A. Lanari, and I. Dajani, “Pseudo-random binary sequence phase modulation for narrow linewidth, kilowatt, monolithic fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Express 22, 17735-17744 (2014).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. C. Jauregui, T. Eidam, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Impact of modal interference on the beam quality of high-power fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Express 19, 3258-3271 (2011).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. T. H. Loftus, A. M. Thomas, P. R. Hoffman, M. Norsen, R. Royse, A. Liu, and E. C. Honea, “Spectrally beam-combined fiber lasers for high-average-power applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron 13, 487-497 (2007).
    CrossRef
  28. A. Jung, S. Song, S. Kim, and K. Oh, “Numerical analyses of a spectral beam combining multiple Yb-doped fiber lasers for optimal beam quality and combining efficiency,” Opt. Express 30, 13305-13319 (2022).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. F. Tian, H. Yan, L. Chen, Y. Ye, J. Li, J. Luo, and F. Lu, “Investigation on the influence of spectral linewidth broadening on beam quality in spectral beam combination,” Proc. SPIE 9255, 92553N (2015).
    CrossRef
  30. B. M. Anderson, A. Flores, and I. Dajani, “Filtered pseudo random modulated fiber amplifier with enhanced coherence and nonlinear suppression,” Opt. Express 25, 17671-17682 (2017).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Y. Zheng, Y. Yang, J. Wang, M. Hu, G. Liu, X. Zhao, X. Chen, K. Liu, C. Zhao, B. He, and J. Zhao, “10.8 kW spectral beam combination of eight all-fiber superfluorescent sources and their dispersion compensation,” Opt. Express 24, 12063-12071 (2016).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. I. Kim, S. So, J. Mun, K. H. Lee, J. H. Lee, T. Lee, and J. Rho, “Optical characterizations and thermal analyses of HfO2/SiO2 multilayered diffraction gratings for high-power continuous wave laser,” J. Phys. Photonics 2, 025004 (2020).
    CrossRef
  33. P. G. Sibley, R. L. Ward, L. E. Roberts, S. P. Francis, and D. A. Shaddock, “Crosstalk reduction for multi-channel optical phase metrology,” Opt. Express 28, 10400-10424 (2020).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. C. Zeringue, I. Dajani, S. Naderi, G. T. Moore, and C. Robin, “A theoretical study of transient stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical fibers seeded with phase-modulated light,” Opt. Express 20, 21196-21213 (2012).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. I. Gursoy and S. Tunc, “The effects of M 2 factor on steel materials,” Proc. SPIE 11539, 115390I (2020).
  36. T. S. Ross, Laser Beam Quality Metrics (SPIE Press, USA, 2013).
  37. G. Yang, L. Liu, Z. Jiang, J. Guo, and T. F. Wang, “The effect of beam quality factor for the laser beam propagation through turbulence,” Optik 156, 148-154 (2018).
    CrossRef
  38. P. Madasamy, D. R. Jander, C. D. Brooks, T. H. Loftus, A. M. Thomas, P. Jones, and E. C. Honea, “Dual-grating spectral beam combination of high-power fiber lasers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15, 337-343 (2009).
    CrossRef
  39. N. A. Naderi, I. Dajani, and A. Flores, “High-efficiency, kilowatt 1034 nm all-fiber amplifier operating at 11 pm linewidth,” Opt. Lett. 41, 1018-1021 (2016).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. W. Y. W. Lim, K. W. Seah, Y. E. Ye, B. S. Tan, and C. P. Seah, “Wavelength flexible, kW-level narrow linewidth fibre laser based on 7 GHz PRBS phase modulation,” Proc. SPIE 11260, 11126006 (2020).
  41. Y. Wang, Y. Feng, X. Wang, H. Yan, J. Peng, W. Peng, Y. Sun, Y. Ma, and C. Tang, “6.5 GHz linearly polarized kilowatt fiber amplifier based on active polarization control,” Appl. Opt. 56, 2760-2765 (2017).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Y. Wang, Y. Sun, W. Peng, Y. Feng, J. Wang, Y. Ma, Q. Gao, R. Zhu, and C. Tang, “3.25 kW all-fiberized and polarization-maintained Yb-doped amplifier with a 20 GHz linewidth and near-diffraction-limited beam quality,” Appl. Opt. 60, 6331-6336 (2021).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Y. Wang, Y. Feng, Y. Ma, Z. Chang, W. Peng, Y. Sun, Q. Gao, R. Zhu, and C. Tang, “2.5 kW narrow linewidth linearly polarized all-fiber MOPA with cascaded phase-modulation to suppress SBS induced self-pulsing,” IEEE Photonics J. 12, 1502715 (2020).
    CrossRef
  44. S. Ren, P. Ma, W. Li, G. Wang, Y. Chen, J. Song, W. Liu, and P. Zhou, “3.96 kW all-fiberized linearly polarized and narrow linewidth fiber laser with near-diffraction-limited beam quality,” Nanomaterials 12, 2541 (2022).
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. D. Meng, P. Ma, X. Wang, Y. Ma, R. Su, P. Zhou, and L. Yang, “Kilowatt-level high brightness narrow-linewidth polarization-maintained fiber amplifiers based on laser gain competition,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, 012007 (2018).
    CrossRef
  46. P. Ma, R. Tao, R. Su, X. Wang, P. Zhou, and Z. Liu, “1.89 kW all-fiberized and polarization-maintained amplifiers with narrow linewidth and neat-diffraction-limited beam quality,” Opt. Express 24, 4187-4195 (2016).
    Pubmed CrossRef

Article

Research Paper

Curr. Opt. Photon. 2023; 7(6): 665-672

Published online December 25, 2023 https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2023.7.6.665

Copyright © Optical Society of Korea.

Impact of the Spectral Linewidth of a Pseudorandom Binary Sequence (PRBS)-Modulated Laser on Stimulated Brillouin Scattering and Beam Quality

Aeri Jung1, Sanggwon Song1, Kwang Hyun Lee2, Jung Hwan Lee2, Kyunghwan Oh1

1Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea
2Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon 34186, Korea

Correspondence to:*koh@yonsei.ac.kr, ORCID 0000-0003-2544-0216

Received: April 10, 2023; Revised: October 20, 2023; Accepted: October 23, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study focuses on investigating the impact of the spectral linewidth of a seed laser in a master-oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) configuration on stimulated Brillouin scattering and the beam quality of the output diffracted by a grating. To conduct the study, a distributed feedback (DFB) laser is modulated in a pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS) and amplified by a two-stage Yb-doped fiber amplifier to achieve an output power of over 1 kW. The spectral linewidth of the seed laser is systematically varied from 1 to 12 GHz in the frequency domain by varying the PRBS modulation parameters. The experimental results reveal a tradeoff between suppressing stimulated Brillouin scattering and enhancing beam quality with increased spectral linewidth. Therefore, the study provides valuable insights into optimizing spectral beam combining to achieve high beam quality and scalable power upgrade in fiber lasers.

Keywords: Fiber laser, Linewidth, Pseudorandom binary sequence, Spectral beam combining, Stimulated Brillouin scattering

I. INTRODUCTION

Yb-doped fiber laser systems have been rapidly developed for various industrial and military laser applications, facilitating the production of high-quality laser beams with power-scaled output power [13]. There have been recent attempts to increase Yb-doped fiber laser (YDF-laser) power even further, which include the use of the master-oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) configuration [4, 5] and beam-combining technologies [6, 7]. Among these technologies, beam combining the outputs from the MOPA has shown high feasibility for YDF-laser power scaling [8, 9]. However, this scheme requires multistage amplification and faces various technological bottlenecks, such as thermal effects [10], stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) [11], stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) [12], photodarkening [13], and transverse mode instability (TMI) [14].

The issue of SBS has been a persistent problem in laser systems, particularly in MOPA architectures. SBS is a phenomenon in which the light wave interacting with an acoustic phonon in the optical waveguide creates a backward-propagating wave that can damage the laser system and limit the output power [11, 1518]. To mitigate the effects of SBS, various techniques have been proposed. One of the most widely used techniques is spectral linewidth broadening [19]. This technique involves adding a phase modulation component to the seed laser components, which can increase the threshold power of SBS with radio-frequency (RF) signals, including the white-noise source (WNS) [20] and pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS) [21]. This technique has been shown to be effective in increasing the SBS threshold in MOPA systems. Another technique is the use of short-length large-mode area fibers [22] and a structural design of optical fiber [23]. These can help to reduce the acoustic phonon density in the fiber, which can lower the SBS threshold power. In spectral-linewidth-broadening schemes, the use of PRBS modulation has been preferred over WNS, as it provides a higher SBS threshold. PRBS modulation has been successfully employed in YDF-MOPA to achieve kilowatt-class laser power [12, 24, 25].

In addition to the issue of SBS, the spectral linewidth of lasers is also a critical parameter in beam-combining technologies, which is another avenue of laser power scaling. In particular, spectral beam combining (SBC) requires multiple lasers to overlap in both the spatial and spectral domains, with each laser having a narrow spectral linewidth to avoid undesirable interference among them [26]. Broad spectral linewidth of a laser can result in significant chromatic dispersion at a diffraction grating, which can adversely affect beam quality in SBC [2729]. Therefore, finding an optimal amount of spectral broadening that can satisfy both SBS suppression and SBC enhancement is essential. Beam-combining technologies have been adopted for the outputs from MOPA configurations to increase the net output power several times without noticeable beam-quality degradation, compared to single-channel power-scaling attempts [30, 31]. However, it is not yet clear how the spectral linewidth would affect both SBS and the beam quality of SBC in YDF-MOPA systems. Further research is needed to determine the optimal spectral linewidth for SBC in YDF-MOPA systems. This involves investigating the tradeoff between SBS suppression and SBC enhancement, and determining the effect of spectral linewidth on beam quality. By finding the optimal spectral linewidth, it is possible to achieve high net output powers while maintaining excellent beam quality, which is essential for many applications, including laser processing and medical treatments.

This paper presents an experimental analysis of the impacts of the spectral linewidth of a single-channel YDF-MOPA on SBS and beam quality. The YDF-MOPA system consists of a distributed feedback (DFB) laser diode modulated in PRBS formats, and two-stage YDF amplifiers that increase the continuous-wave (CW) output power to over one kilowatt. To investigate the effects of spectral linewidth, the back-reflected SBS power from the final-state YDF amplifier is measured, and the beam quality is measured for the output laser diffracted by a grating. The grating specifications used in the experiment are chosen to be similar to those used in SBC, enabling the experimental configuration to be readily adopted for multichannel SBC. The experimental findings provide valuable information for designing multiwavelength SBC systems using MOPA configurations. By understanding the effects of spectral linewidth on both SBS and beam quality, it is possible to optimize the system design and achieve high net output powers while maintaining excellent beam quality. These results can have significant implications for laser processing and medical treatments, where high-power laser systems with excellent beam quality are crucial.

II. METHOD

Figure 1 depicts the experimental setups employed to assess the impact of linewidth on a YDF-laser system. The diagram exhibits a systematic outline of the different stages of the experiment, which commences with the generation of a PRBS signal utilized for the phase modulation of the seed beam.

Figure 1. Scheme for the radio-frequency (RF) spectrum measurement of (a) pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) signal, (b) the phase modulated laser, and (c) the Yb-doped laser system for the measurement of SBS power and beam quality M 2. The first YDF has a core diameter of 10 μm and a cladding diameter of 125 μm. The second YDF has a core diameter of 15 μm and a cladding diameter of 130 μm. FPGA, field programmable gate array; ESA, electric spectrum analyzer; PM, phase modulator; VOA, variable optical attenuator; PD, photodetector; LD, laser diode; WDM, wavelength division multiplexing.

Figure 1(a) illustrates a detailed schematic of the experimental setup utilized to measure the electrical PRBS signal used for phase modulation of the seed beam. The PRBS signal is generated using a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) board (Altera, Intel FPGA; Intel Co., CA, USA), which generates an RF square-wave signal that is converted to a PRBS signal. To verify the signal generated by the FPGA board, the RF spectrum of the PRBS signal is measured using an electrical spectrum analyzer (ESA). Additionally, a compiled program called Quartus Prime 17.0 (Altera; Intel Co.) is used to change the modulation frequency and PRBS pattern. The modulation frequency is varied within the range of 1 to 12 GHz, and the modulation frequency fm and PRBS pattern n determine the spacing fm/(2n − 1) between frequency combs. This spacing is a critical factor in determining the impact of linewidth on the laser system’s performance. The FPGA board in this experimental setup can generate PRBS patterns 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 17, 23, and 27; PRBS 7 is used in this study, as it offers the best mitigation of SBS under a modulation frequency of 5 GHz.

Figure 1(b) shows a heterodyne setup utilized to measure the increased linewidth of the phase-modulated beam with PRBS signals in the frequency domain. This setup is critical for accurately analyzing dispersion in the grating, as it confirms the increase in linewidth of the phase-modulated beam according to the modulation frequency. The FPGA board used in Fig. 1(a) is also utilized in Figs. 1(b) and 1(c). To modulate the phase of a seed laser with a modulation depth of π, the phase modulator (PM) (NIR-MPX-LN-20; iXblue Inc., CA, USA) requires a voltage of 5.5 V. However, the electrical signal used in the experiment has a power of only 0.1 V. To increase the voltage to the required level, an RF amplifier (DR-DG-20-MO; iXblue Inc.) is used. A DFB laser with a narrow linewidth of 5 MHz and wavelength of 1,064 nm is used as the seed beam. To prevent damage from backward propagation, the beam passes through an isolator. Then, the beam is split into two at a 5:5 coupler, with one part entering the PM and the other serving as the reference beam.

The reference beam is directed through the 5:5 coupler to reduce its power by half due, to the insertion loss of the PM. The beat signal between the modulated and reference beams is measured by ESA. This beat frequency is used to calculate the linewidth of the phase-modulated beam.

Figure 1(c) provides a comprehensive schematic diagram of a YDF-laser system, along with a measurement setup for SBS power and beam quality M 2. The setup includes the components used in Fig. 1(b), such as the DFB laser, FPGA board, RF amplifier, and PM. However, in Fig. 1(c), there are two stages of ytterbium-doped fiber amplifiers (YDFA), to increase the output power. The first stage has a core diameter of 10 μm and a cladding diameter of 125 μm, while the second stage has a larger core diameter of 15 μm and a cladding diameter of 130 μm. To prevent SBS from damaging optical components, optical isolators are placed between the seed laser and PM, and between the first and second stages of YDFA. The SBS power generated in the second stage of YDFA is measured with a power meter. The lens is contained in the endcap, and the laser emitted from the endcap has a diameter of 8 mm, which is maintained until the beam profiler. After adjusting the vertical angle and height of the beam incident upon the grating, the beam quality M 2 is observed using beam-quality measuring equipment (M2-200s; Ophir-Spiricon, UT, USA). The grating has a groove density of 1,740 lines/mm and a diffraction −1th-order efficiency of 99%, to accurately analyze dispersion in the grating [32].

III. RESULTS

In Fig. 2, the PRBS 7 signals generated by the FPGA board are measured with ESA for modulation frequencies ranging from 1 to 12 GHz. In the frequency domain, the envelope takes on a sinc2 shape, which broadens as the modulation frequency increases. This result is consistent with what is known about PRBS signals [25]. However, the frequency comb of PRBS 7 has intervals of fm/(27 − 1) Hz, which are too small to be seen by the naked eye. Theoretically, the PRBS spectrum should be zero at the modulation frequency, but spikes related to crosstalk signals [33] are observed. Figure 3 also shows these spikes in the modulated laser linewidth.

Figure 2. Pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) 7 signal for modulation frequencies of 1–12 GHz, in the frequency domain.

Figure 3. Spectral linewidth of the modulated beam with pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) 7 signal, in the frequency domain.

In Fig. 3, the linewidth of phase-modulated light in the frequency domain is depicted. To determine whether the modulation frequency increases the linewidth of the phase-modulated light, it is necessary to compare the RF spectra of the PRBS signal and the phase-modulated light, as well as to observe the dispersion of the beam diffracted by the grating due to the linewidth. Upon comparing Figs. 2 and 3, it can be noted that the first envelope’s shape in both spectra is identical. Additionally, the power at the modulation frequency is zero in both spectra. These results show that the modulation frequency broadens the linewidth of the phase-modulated light.

The phase-modulated light is utilized to demonstrate SBS suppression; Figure 4 shows the SBS power as a function of output power for the modulation frequency. The SBS power, achieved using a 99:1 coupler as shown in Fig. 1(c), is of the order of several milliwatts. DFB denotes a narrow-linewidth laser without phase modulation, and the SBS threshold power is observed to be around 5 W. When the linewidth is 1 GHz, it is confirmed that the SBS power rapidly increases near 25 W. This indicates that, in the case of modulation with PRBS, the SBS threshold power is approximately 5 times as high as that without modulation. It is verified that since the enhancement factor is 10 at the modulation frequency of 1 GHz for PRBS 7, as reported in [34], the SBS threshold power may be lower than the predicted power. When the modulation frequency is 3 GHz or higher, there is only a slight difference in the SBS power. Since the SBS threshold power at a modulation frequency of 3 GHz for PRBS 7 is around 3 times that at 1 GHz in [34], it is expected that the SBS threshold power can be confirmed when the output power exceeds 75 W.

Figure 4. Back-reflected stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) power as function of output power at the 2nd ytterbium-doped fiber amplifiers (YDFA), for modulation frequencies of 1–12 GHz. Distributed feedback (DFB) indicates the unmodulated beam.

Figure 5 presents the measured results for beam quality M 2 as a function of the modulation frequency. The x direction is chosen as the direction in which dispersion occurs due to the grooves of the diffraction grating. The analytical solution for beam quality MX2 Eq. (1) is explained in [27], and is modified for cases where the input beam quality is not 1:

Figure 5. Beam quality M 2 as a function of spectral linewidth.

MX2=Mi22+πω0Δλg2λcosα2,

where Mi2 is the input beam quality, ω0 is the input beam’s radius, ∆λ is the linewidth, g is the grating’s groove density of 1,740 lines/mm, λ is the wavelength, and α is the angle of incidence upon the grating. When the laser is incident with radius ω0, divergence angle θ0, and incident angle α, the laser is diffracted with radius ω1, divergence angle θ1, and diffraction angle β. For ∆λ = 0, to first order, a single-mode Gaussian beam is obtained by

M2=ω1θ1ω0θ0 and ω1ω0=θ0θ1=cosβcosα.

The angular spread due to the dispersion is

θ1=ω0ω1θ0+Δθ=ω0ω1θ0+gΔλ2cosβ.

The beam quality for the diffracted beam can be written by

M2=1+gΔλ2θ0cosα.

Assuming the Gaussian linewidth of 1/e2 and Mi2 ≠ 0, the beam quality in the x-direction can be represented by Eq. (1), taking into account the dispersion effect on the linewidth within the grating.

The increase in linewidth results in an increase in beam quality along the diffraction axis (x-direction). Dispersion of the diffracted beam, the input beam quality, and variations in the optical axis due to the vertical angle of the grating, contribute to the difference in beam quality M 2. The vertical angle of the grating is set for beam-path separation, due to the Littrow configuration of the grating [32]. Furthermore, the measured beam quality may be degraded compared to the analytically calculated beam quality with a Gaussian linewidth of 1/e2, since the light is modulated with a discrete frequency comb using PRBS and the linewidth is the full width at half maximum. In this experiment, the beam quality M 2 exceeds 1.5 for linewidths above 3 GHz. However, in practical applications it is imperative to maintain the beam quality M 2 below 1.5 [3537] and analyze the crucial factors leading to its degradation. Variations in the optical axis due to input beam quality and the vertical angle of the grating contribute to an increase in beam quality M 2, in addition to dispersion [28]. Furthermore, the measured beam quality M 2 may degrade compared to the analytically calculated beam quality with a Gaussian linewidth, since the light is modulated with a discrete frequency comb using PRBS. This study is the first to report the measurement of the diffracted-beam quality of a laser modulated with a PRBS signal, in relation to the linewidth.

To summarize, this study has investigated the impact of linewidth on SBS suppression and beam quality in a high-power fiber-laser system. The results indicate that a modulation frequency of 3 GHz is optimal when the output power is in the range of several tens of watts. This modulation frequency allows for SBS mitigation while maintaining beam quality M 2 below 1.5, as demonstrated in Figs. 4 and 5. Previous studies have shown that kilowatt-class lasers can be achieved with SBS mitigation and near-diffraction-limited beam quality, as shown in Table 1. However, little attention has been given to the diffracted-beam quality, which can be degraded by dispersion [38]. The diffracted-beam quality must be considered in a beam-combining system for power scaling to tens of kilowatts. Therefore, it is crucial to optimize the beam quality of high-power fiber-laser systems comprehensively, considering factors such as beam quality before linewidth broadening, mode-field diameter of the YDF, lengths of fibers, and number of combined beams, in consideration of the dispersion effect.

TABLE 1. Yb-doped fiber (YDF)-laser modulated with various radio frequency (RF) signals.

RF SignalWavelength (nm)Linewidth (GHz)Power (kW)Beam Quality M 2Diffracted Beam Quality M 2
PRBS 5 [27]1,06431.171.2-
PRBS 8 [39]1,0343.511.1–1.2-
PRBS 7 [40]1,036–1,0717~11.19–1.21-
PRBS 7 [This Work]1,0641~120.031.141.36–2.75
N/A [38]1,060400.011.021.86
WNS [41]1,064.76.51.091.1-
WNS [42]1,064203.251.22-
WNS [43]1,064322.62<1.3-
WNS [44]1,064164.33.961.31-
Sine [45]1,0647.61.081.14-
Sine [46]1,064.4451.891.3-

IV. CONCLUSION

This study has investigated the impact of linewidth broadening on a YDF-laser system consisting of a master-oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) and SBC, suppressing SBS by phase modulation using a PRBS signal. To achieve this, the spectrum of the PRBS 7 signal generated by an FPGA board and phase-modulated light was measured within a frequency range of 1 to 12 GHz. The results showed that the linewidth increased in proportion to the modulation frequency. Furthermore, through phase modulation using the PRBS signal, the SBS threshold power was increased by more than a factor of 5, compared to the case without modulation, suggesting that linewidth broadening can effectively suppress SBS. However, the study also found that the diffraction-beam quality deteriorated as the linewidth increased. Therefore, the diffraction-beam quality as a function of modulation frequency in the YDF-laser system with phase modulation based on PRBS was measured for the first time. The findings from this study can be applied to improve the power and beam quality of high-power optical-fiber-laser systems.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Agency For Defense Development by the Korean Government (UD160018RD).

FUNDING

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant, funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2019 R1A2C2011293).

DISCLOSURES

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at the time of publication, but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Scheme for the radio-frequency (RF) spectrum measurement of (a) pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) signal, (b) the phase modulated laser, and (c) the Yb-doped laser system for the measurement of SBS power and beam quality M 2. The first YDF has a core diameter of 10 μm and a cladding diameter of 125 μm. The second YDF has a core diameter of 15 μm and a cladding diameter of 130 μm. FPGA, field programmable gate array; ESA, electric spectrum analyzer; PM, phase modulator; VOA, variable optical attenuator; PD, photodetector; LD, laser diode; WDM, wavelength division multiplexing.
Current Optics and Photonics 2023; 7: 665-672https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2023.7.6.665

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) 7 signal for modulation frequencies of 1–12 GHz, in the frequency domain.
Current Optics and Photonics 2023; 7: 665-672https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2023.7.6.665

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Spectral linewidth of the modulated beam with pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) 7 signal, in the frequency domain.
Current Optics and Photonics 2023; 7: 665-672https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2023.7.6.665

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Back-reflected stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) power as function of output power at the 2nd ytterbium-doped fiber amplifiers (YDFA), for modulation frequencies of 1–12 GHz. Distributed feedback (DFB) indicates the unmodulated beam.
Current Optics and Photonics 2023; 7: 665-672https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2023.7.6.665

Fig 5.

Figure 5.Beam quality M 2 as a function of spectral linewidth.
Current Optics and Photonics 2023; 7: 665-672https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2023.7.6.665

TABLE 1 Yb-doped fiber (YDF)-laser modulated with various radio frequency (RF) signals

RF SignalWavelength (nm)Linewidth (GHz)Power (kW)Beam Quality M 2Diffracted Beam Quality M 2
PRBS 5 [27]1,06431.171.2-
PRBS 8 [39]1,0343.511.1–1.2-
PRBS 7 [40]1,036–1,0717~11.19–1.21-
PRBS 7 [This Work]1,0641~120.031.141.36–2.75
N/A [38]1,060400.011.021.86
WNS [41]1,064.76.51.091.1-
WNS [42]1,064203.251.22-
WNS [43]1,064322.62<1.3-
WNS [44]1,064164.33.961.31-
Sine [45]1,0647.61.081.14-
Sine [46]1,064.4451.891.3-

References

  1. Y. Ye, B. Yang, P. Wang, L. Zeng, X. Xi, C. Shi, H. Zhang, X. Wang, P. Zhou, and X. Xu, “Industrial 6 kW high-stability single-stage all-fiber laser oscillator based on conventional large mode area ytterbium-doped fiber,” Laser Phys. 31, 035104 (2021).
    CrossRef
  2. K. Ludewigt, A. Liem, U. Stuhr, and M. Jung, “High-power laser development for laser weapons,” Proc. SPIE 11162, 1116207 (2019).
    CrossRef
  3. M. N. Zervas, “High power ytterbium-doped fiber lasers-fundamentals and applications,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 28, 1442009 (2014).
    CrossRef
  4. Y. Wang, Y. Sun, W. Peng, Y. Feng, J. Wang, Y. Ma, Q. Gao, R. Zhu, and C. Tang, “3.25 kW all-fiberized and polarization-maintained Yb-doped amplifier with a 20 GHz linewidth and near-diffraction-limited beam quality,” Appl. Opt. 60, 6331-6336 (2021).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. P. Zhou, X. Wang, H. Xiao, Y. Ma, and J. Chen, “Review on recent progress on Yb-doped fiber laser in a variety of oscillation spectral ranges,” Laser Phys. 22, 823-831 (2012).
    CrossRef
  6. T. Y. Fan, “Laser beam combining for high-power, high-radiance sources,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 11, 567-577 (2005).
    CrossRef
  7. C. C. Cook and T. Y. Fan, "Spectral beam combining of Yb-doped fiber lasers in an external cavity," in Advanced Solid State Lasers (Optica Publishing Group, 1999), p. paper PD5.
  8. M. Strecker, M. Plötner, F.Stutzki, T.Walbaum, S.Ehrhardt, T. Benkenstein, U. Zeitner, T. Schreiber, R. Eberhardt, A. Tünnermann, U. Stuhr, M. Jung, and K. Ludewigt, “Highly efficient dual-grating 3-channel spectral beam combining of narrow-linewidth monolithic cw Yb-doped fiber amplifiers up to 5.5 kW,” Proc. SPIE 10897, 108970E (2019).
    CrossRef
  9. S. J. McNaught, C. P. Asman, H. Injeyan, A. Jankevics, A. M. F. Johnson, G. C. Jones, H. Komine, J. Machan, J. Marmo, M. McClellan, R. Simpson, J. Sollee, M. M. Valley, M. Weber, and S. Weiss, "100-kW Coherently combined Nd:YAG MOPA laser array," in Frontiers in Optics 2009 (Optica Publishing Group, 2009), p. paper FThD2.
    CrossRef
  10. Z. Xie, S. Fu, Q. Sheng, W. Shi, and J. Yao, “Analysis of thermal effects in high power Yb doped fiber amplifier by distributed pumping,” Proc. SPIE 10457, 104573D (2017).
  11. S. K. Kalyoncu, B. Mete, and A. Yenıay, “Diode-pumped triple-clad fiber MOPA with an output power scaling up to 4.67 kW,” Opt. Lett. 45, 1870-1873 (2020).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Y. Panbiharwala, A. Vasant Harish, Y. Feng, D. Venkitesh, J. Nilsson, and B. Srinivasan, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering mitigation using optimized phase modulation waveforms in high power narrow linewidth Yb-doped fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Express 29, 17183-17200 (2021).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. M. Engholm, M. Tuggle, C. Kucera, T. Hawkins, P. Dragic, and J. Ballato, “On the origin of photodarkening resistance in Yb-doped silica fibers with high aluminum concentration,” Opt. Mater. Express 11, 115-126 (2021).
    CrossRef
  14. Y. Ye, B. Yang, C. Shi, X. Xi, H. Zhang, X. Wang, P. Zhou, and X. Xu, “Towards power improvement of all-Fiber laser oscillators with 30 Μm-core Yb-doped fibers by suppressing transverse mode instability,” Laser Phys. Lett. 17, 085106 (2020).
    CrossRef
  15. E. P. Ippen and R. H. Stolen, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical fibers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 21, 539-541 (1972).
    CrossRef
  16. S. Song, A. Jung, and K. Oh, “High-temperature sensitivity in stimulated Brillouin scattering of 1060 nm single-mode fibers,” Sensors 19, 4731 (2019).
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. O. A. Nieves, M. D. Arnold, M. J. Steel, M. K. Schmidt, and C. G. Poulton, “Noise and pulse dynamics in backward stimulated Brillouin scattering,” Opt. Express 29, 3132-3146 (2021).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. A. Kobyakov, M. Sauer, and D. Chowdhury, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical fibers,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 2, 1-59 (2010).
    CrossRef
  19. T. Li, C. Zha, Y. Sun, Y. Ma, W. Ke, and W. Peng, “3.5 kW bidirectionally pumped narrow-linewidth fiber amplifier seeded by white-noise-source phase-modulated laser,” Laser Phys. 28, 105101 (2018).
    CrossRef
  20. B. Li, M, Liu, Y. Yang, Y. Xian, B. He, and J. Zhou, “Effective Brillouin gain spectra broadening for SBS suppression based on Pseudo random bit sequence phase modulation in fiber system,” IEEE Photonics. J. 13, 7100105 (2021).
    CrossRef
  21. E. Lichtman, R. G. Waarts, and A. A. Friesem, “Stimulated Brillouin scattering excited by a modulated pump wave in single-mode fibers,” J. Light. Technol. 7, 171-174 (1989).
    CrossRef
  22. M. D. Mermelstein, M. J. Andrejco, J. Fini, A. Yablon, C. Headley III, D. J. DiGiovanni, and A. H. McCurdy, “11.2 dB SBS gain suppression in a large mode area Yb-doped optical fiber,” Proc. SPIE 6873, 68730N (2008).
    CrossRef
  23. H. Xiao, G. Ren, Y. Dong, H. Li, S. Xiao, B. Wu, and S. Jian, “A numerical analysis of GeO2-doped multi-step index single-mode fiber for stimulated Brillouin scattering,” J. Opt. 20, 065701 (2018).
    CrossRef
  24. M. Liu, Y. Yang, H. Shen, J. Zhang, X. Zou, H. Wang, L. Yuan, Y. You, G. Bai, B. He, and J. Zhou, “1.27 kW, 2.2 GHz pseudo-random binary sequence phase modulated fiber amplifier with Brillouin gain-spectrum overlap,” Sci. Rep. 10, 629 (2020).
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. A. Flores, C. Robin, A. Lanari, and I. Dajani, “Pseudo-random binary sequence phase modulation for narrow linewidth, kilowatt, monolithic fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Express 22, 17735-17744 (2014).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. C. Jauregui, T. Eidam, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Impact of modal interference on the beam quality of high-power fiber amplifiers,” Opt. Express 19, 3258-3271 (2011).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. T. H. Loftus, A. M. Thomas, P. R. Hoffman, M. Norsen, R. Royse, A. Liu, and E. C. Honea, “Spectrally beam-combined fiber lasers for high-average-power applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron 13, 487-497 (2007).
    CrossRef
  28. A. Jung, S. Song, S. Kim, and K. Oh, “Numerical analyses of a spectral beam combining multiple Yb-doped fiber lasers for optimal beam quality and combining efficiency,” Opt. Express 30, 13305-13319 (2022).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. F. Tian, H. Yan, L. Chen, Y. Ye, J. Li, J. Luo, and F. Lu, “Investigation on the influence of spectral linewidth broadening on beam quality in spectral beam combination,” Proc. SPIE 9255, 92553N (2015).
    CrossRef
  30. B. M. Anderson, A. Flores, and I. Dajani, “Filtered pseudo random modulated fiber amplifier with enhanced coherence and nonlinear suppression,” Opt. Express 25, 17671-17682 (2017).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Y. Zheng, Y. Yang, J. Wang, M. Hu, G. Liu, X. Zhao, X. Chen, K. Liu, C. Zhao, B. He, and J. Zhao, “10.8 kW spectral beam combination of eight all-fiber superfluorescent sources and their dispersion compensation,” Opt. Express 24, 12063-12071 (2016).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. I. Kim, S. So, J. Mun, K. H. Lee, J. H. Lee, T. Lee, and J. Rho, “Optical characterizations and thermal analyses of HfO2/SiO2 multilayered diffraction gratings for high-power continuous wave laser,” J. Phys. Photonics 2, 025004 (2020).
    CrossRef
  33. P. G. Sibley, R. L. Ward, L. E. Roberts, S. P. Francis, and D. A. Shaddock, “Crosstalk reduction for multi-channel optical phase metrology,” Opt. Express 28, 10400-10424 (2020).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. C. Zeringue, I. Dajani, S. Naderi, G. T. Moore, and C. Robin, “A theoretical study of transient stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical fibers seeded with phase-modulated light,” Opt. Express 20, 21196-21213 (2012).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. I. Gursoy and S. Tunc, “The effects of M 2 factor on steel materials,” Proc. SPIE 11539, 115390I (2020).
  36. T. S. Ross, Laser Beam Quality Metrics (SPIE Press, USA, 2013).
  37. G. Yang, L. Liu, Z. Jiang, J. Guo, and T. F. Wang, “The effect of beam quality factor for the laser beam propagation through turbulence,” Optik 156, 148-154 (2018).
    CrossRef
  38. P. Madasamy, D. R. Jander, C. D. Brooks, T. H. Loftus, A. M. Thomas, P. Jones, and E. C. Honea, “Dual-grating spectral beam combination of high-power fiber lasers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15, 337-343 (2009).
    CrossRef
  39. N. A. Naderi, I. Dajani, and A. Flores, “High-efficiency, kilowatt 1034 nm all-fiber amplifier operating at 11 pm linewidth,” Opt. Lett. 41, 1018-1021 (2016).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. W. Y. W. Lim, K. W. Seah, Y. E. Ye, B. S. Tan, and C. P. Seah, “Wavelength flexible, kW-level narrow linewidth fibre laser based on 7 GHz PRBS phase modulation,” Proc. SPIE 11260, 11126006 (2020).
  41. Y. Wang, Y. Feng, X. Wang, H. Yan, J. Peng, W. Peng, Y. Sun, Y. Ma, and C. Tang, “6.5 GHz linearly polarized kilowatt fiber amplifier based on active polarization control,” Appl. Opt. 56, 2760-2765 (2017).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Y. Wang, Y. Sun, W. Peng, Y. Feng, J. Wang, Y. Ma, Q. Gao, R. Zhu, and C. Tang, “3.25 kW all-fiberized and polarization-maintained Yb-doped amplifier with a 20 GHz linewidth and near-diffraction-limited beam quality,” Appl. Opt. 60, 6331-6336 (2021).
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Y. Wang, Y. Feng, Y. Ma, Z. Chang, W. Peng, Y. Sun, Q. Gao, R. Zhu, and C. Tang, “2.5 kW narrow linewidth linearly polarized all-fiber MOPA with cascaded phase-modulation to suppress SBS induced self-pulsing,” IEEE Photonics J. 12, 1502715 (2020).
    CrossRef
  44. S. Ren, P. Ma, W. Li, G. Wang, Y. Chen, J. Song, W. Liu, and P. Zhou, “3.96 kW all-fiberized linearly polarized and narrow linewidth fiber laser with near-diffraction-limited beam quality,” Nanomaterials 12, 2541 (2022).
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. D. Meng, P. Ma, X. Wang, Y. Ma, R. Su, P. Zhou, and L. Yang, “Kilowatt-level high brightness narrow-linewidth polarization-maintained fiber amplifiers based on laser gain competition,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58, 012007 (2018).
    CrossRef
  46. P. Ma, R. Tao, R. Su, X. Wang, P. Zhou, and Z. Liu, “1.89 kW all-fiberized and polarization-maintained amplifiers with narrow linewidth and neat-diffraction-limited beam quality,” Opt. Express 24, 4187-4195 (2016).
    Pubmed CrossRef